Re: [openpgp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-00.txt

Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> Sat, 30 January 2021 02:14 UTC

Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5243A14AA for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 18:14:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=fifthhorseman.net header.b=63430gAe; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fifthhorseman.net header.b=i28cF9lN
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LonIxKVCRSRC for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 18:14:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [IPv6:2001:470:1:116::7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 645053A14A9 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 18:14:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019; t=1611972893; h=from : to : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=4SRmEAuspVMEyqS4jmUudtCumUtjh52pP3YhVzxSmko=; b=63430gAe8iwI6yb+W0G6RdcBI+JjsWe9eNAwS30ocEe+9CjBT0+RDIqBqQ8WNKE3hX4DN YTIcMS0anJ2k9L2Aw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019rsa; t=1611972893; h=from : to : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=4SRmEAuspVMEyqS4jmUudtCumUtjh52pP3YhVzxSmko=; b=i28cF9lNkqQlio5YLMyOHjyaepuaSEqj+eiFn3JScNCxEDQ+fH9kgWQaY7/CRHAWn3FvI Y9I5HxgYStPuFNempsXDayGuUTkZI3qLg/DYpwpk45aIMfyFde7hYq3FPcSvegcRjy1jLNJ xBII/iPKJDmpuGZouXfx2Gc6vBgxiwRNwbIo6ArB09jNHbWQP7v8k2gOw3HWhN062mFxzfQ 9ByVeHjksUWkrpqTYtQU4Qtdk5uiaW+BJBcKo7bqTBN5u3oeXgPvI8Z5f/LyPRt7Z51yN5b xRsSpWY3i5e2oZWQLk9q/sk8YILMTcfjB9c3Pqz+ixckQRZfxRO+EY56Oi+Q==
Received: from fifthhorseman.net (lair.fifthhorseman.net [108.58.6.98]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D2F1AF9A5; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 21:14:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9553A20296; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 21:14:50 -0500 (EST)
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, openpgp@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <629addad-3dc3-a490-46db-5fafab95c7d5@nohats.ca>
References: <161193808437.14457.1252111225434038573@ietfa.amsl.com> <629addad-3dc3-a490-46db-5fafab95c7d5@nohats.ca>
Autocrypt: addr=dkg@fifthhorseman.net; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEX+i03xYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdACA4xvL/xI5dHedcnkfViyq84doe8zFRid9jW7CC9XBiI0QQf FgoAgwWCX+i03wWJBZ+mAAMLCQcJEOCS6zpcoQ26RxQAAAAAAB4AIHNhbHRAbm90YXRpb25zLnNl cXVvaWEtcGdwLm9yZ/tr8E9NA10HvcAVlSxnox6z62KXCInWjZaiBIlgX6O5AxUKCAKbAQIeARYh BMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AADZHQD/Zx9nc3N2kj13AUsKMr/7zekBtgfSIGB3hRCU74Su G44A/34Yp6IAkndewLxb1WdRSokycnaCVyrk0nb4imeAYyoPtBc8ZGtnQGZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4u bmV0PojRBBMWCgCDBYJf6LTfBYkFn6YAAwsJBwkQ4JLrOlyhDbpHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3Rh dGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3JnL0Gwxvypz2tu1IPG+yu1zPjkiZwpscsitwrVvzN3bbADFQoI ApsBAh4BFiEEwp+KDAHzXjTYFqpc4JLrOlyhDboAAPkXAP0Z29z7jW+YzLzPTQML4EQLMbkHOfU4 +s+ki81Czt0WqgD/SJ8RyrqDCtEP8+E4ZSR01ysKqh+MUAsTaJlzZjehiQ24MwRf6LTfFgkrBgEE AdpHDwEBB0DkKHOW2kmqfAK461+acQ49gc2Z6VoXMChRqobGP0ubb4kBiAQYFgoBOgWCX+i03wWJ BZ+mAAkQ4JLrOlyhDbpHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3RhdGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3Jnfvo+ nHoxDwaLaJD8XZuXiaqBNZtIGXIypF1udBBRoc0CmwICHgG+oAQZFgoAbwWCX+i03wkQPp1xc3He VlxHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3RhdGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3JnaheiqE7Pfi3Atb3GGTw+ jFcBGOaobgzEJrhEuFpXREEWIQQttUkcnfDcj0MoY88+nXFzcd5WXAAAvrsBAIJ5sBg8Udocv25N stN/zWOiYpnjjvOjVMLH4fV3pWE1AP9T6hzHz7hRnAA8d01vqoxOlQ3O6cb/kFYAjqx3oMXSBhYh BMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AADX7gD/b83VObe14xrNP8xcltRrBZF5OE1rQSPkMNy+eWpk eCwA/1hxiS8ZxL5/elNjXiWuHXEvUGnRoVj745Vl48sZPVYMuDgEX+i03xIKKwYBBAGXVQEFAQEH QIGex1WZbH6xhUBve5mblScGYU+Y8QJOomXH+rr5tMsMAwEICYjJBBgWCgB7BYJf6LTfBYkFn6YA CRDgkus6XKENukcUAAAAAAAeACBzYWx0QG5vdGF0aW9ucy5zZXF1b2lhLXBncC5vcmcEAx9vTD3b J0SXkhvcRcCr6uIDJwic3KFKxkH1m4QW0QKbDAIeARYhBMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AAAX mwD8CWmukxwskU82RZLMk5fm1wCgMB5z8dA50KLw3rgsCykBAKg1w/Y7XpBS3SlXEegIg1K1e6dR fRxL7Z37WZXoH8AH
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 21:14:49 -0500
Message-ID: <87o8h7cgrq.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/XnfiKQdTkrAIUUMUmV-QMePchaA>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-00.txt
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 02:14:57 -0000

On Fri 2021-01-29 11:59:31 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
> The -00 document is just the re-generated version of RFC4880. The only
> changes are the updated boilerplate and generating code differences of
> the xml tools over the years, as well as the document author, role and
> name/time of the draft.

Thanks for this, Paul!

> You can see the diff with RFC4880 using this url:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org//rfcdiff?url1=https://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4880.txt&url2=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-00.txt

I've reviewed this diff and I don't see any substantive changes from RFC
4880 -- just minor formatting differences.  I hope other folks on the
list will take a minute or two to confirm that they're also seeing the
same situation.

I've proposed some document editing workflow clarifications over on
https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/rfc4880bis/-/merge_requests/31, including
an ephemeral section (to be removed when we make it to an RFC) that
describes how to collaborate on the document.

The proposed ephemeral section merely echos what we've discussed here,
saying:

>> # Document Workflow
>> 
>> This document is built from markdown using [ruby-kramdown-rfc2629](https://rubygems.org/gems/kramdown-rfc2629), and tracked using [git](https://git-scm.com/).
>> The markdown source under development can be found in the file `crypto-refresh.md` in the `main` branch of the [git repository](https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/rfc4880bis).
>> Discussion of this document should take place on the [openpgp@ietf.org mailing list](https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp).
>> 
>> A non-substantive editorial nit can be submitted directly as a [merge request](https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/rfc4880bis/-/merge_requests/new).
>> A substantive proposed edit may also be submitted as a merge request, but should simultaneously be sent to the mailing list for discussion.
>> 
>> An open problem can be recorded and tracked as [an issue](https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/rfc4880bis/-/issues) in the gitlab issue tracker, but discussion of the issue should take place on the mailing list.
>> 
>> \[Note to RFC-Editor: Please remove this section on publication.\]

The merge request also includes a nice contribution to the Makefile from
Vincent Breitmoser for how someone comfortable with docker can build the
draft from source.  Thanks, Vincent!

If the editors are comfortable with this change, it'd be great to merge
it into the main branch before we release -01.

> We will send out the -01 version in the next couple of days.

Looking forward to it!

        --dkg