Re: [openpgp] "OpenPGP Simple"

Stephen Paul Weber <singpolyma@singpolyma.net> Tue, 17 March 2015 15:13 UTC

Return-Path: <singpolyma@singpolyma.net>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B671A1BC8 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 08:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uyqgVuHEeudA for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 08:13:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from singpolyma.net (singpolyma.net [184.107.182.218]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95E81A1B46 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 08:13:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by singpolyma.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9264AF210D; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:13:56 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:13:55 -0500
From: Stephen Paul Weber <singpolyma@singpolyma.net>
To: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Message-ID: <20150317151355.GC2983@singpolyma-liberty>
References: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73AAFB3811@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73AAFB3811@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>
Jabber-ID: singpolyma@singpolyma.net
OpenPGP: id=CE519CDE; url=https://singpolyma.net/public.asc
X-URL: https://singpolyma.net
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/Xv0h8zMIv3PkWdymUXadOH__maA>
Cc: "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] "OpenPGP Simple"
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:13:59 -0000

>It's not just the checksum, the entire ASCII armoring should have been
>discarded years, no decades, ago.

Maybe.  I mostly just think it could be relegated to a seperate RFC that's 
just refereced from the main one as optional.

-- 
Stephen Paul Weber, @singpolyma
See <http://singpolyma.net> for how I prefer to be contacted
edition right joseph