Re: [openpgp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-01.txt

Heiko Schaefer <heiko.schaefer@posteo.de> Sat, 06 February 2021 22:38 UTC

Return-Path: <heiko.schaefer@posteo.de>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37423A2CC4 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 14:38:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=posteo.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8OBCdyC-wDMZ for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 14:38:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout02.posteo.de (mout02.posteo.de [185.67.36.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C18A83A2CC3 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 14:38:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81EA02400FC for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 23:38:53 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1612651134; bh=owXyzK10thcQhlzn13qJuGHDeQhIUrDoCHHdHm4cC28=; h=To:From:Subject:Date:From; b=A8Rakb7BffwMJjgVyjN8GwgQYTIgwDY6Y5EWbbrcheWJqJbVSnEeo6ii0zbE2f/HQ SSVoTEJ3pElO6TP1McdN1qPVJkjy0Pl/uUQ7LrI8CMlfwxzJDk8vDOVNtVY88oZjjX E09QrfUWhZ/sFaKVnCEFjC40lNV6OTWGNtkeK6b0mKcgoLhzZ7Xl2X32A4eWglW6ER Khm/PfUs/Ia7PgxgN7MLzdZlsqBCSCuw8F4QRywnZsxPOrL29fwqSnU1yCZQ852YbW 7LdZf3lDtJ5MN/L9Fg37/Ra4Q/M4OmBz3Ok/dxHXeCV6VSYYWm0Ym+Y+PONAWEufgp ZzAR3eG/RujvQ==
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4DY6dn17lNz6tmJ for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 23:38:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (daneel.foundation.hs [192.168.20.2]) by mail.foundation.hs (Postfix) with ESMTP id E752773C2F for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 23:38:49 +0100 (CET)
To: openpgp@ietf.org
References: <161254580617.29620.7114088127291075805@ietfa.amsl.com> <44a9245e-d6af-8919-6d35-3c7672bfa54b@nohats.ca> <31231.1612650697@localhost>
From: Heiko Schaefer <heiko.schaefer@posteo.de>
Message-ID: <6d97ee4b-21d5-e558-2bd9-3b33dfc4ae84@posteo.de>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2021 23:38:49 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <31231.1612650697@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/Y2xfo0o5h4exHs9ONRMs__Iqh0k>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-01.txt
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 22:39:00 -0000

On 2/6/21 11:31 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> looks good to me.
>
> Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
>     > On Fri, 5 Feb 2021, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>
>     >> Subject: [openpgp] I-D Action:
>     >> draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-01.txt
>
>     > We just submitted -01 version. You can see the diff here:
>
>     >> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>     >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-01
>
> SHA224     | 0x30, 0x31,
> ->
> SHA224     | 0x30, 0x2D
>
> looks like an errata fix?  (Table 5) I looked in gitlab briefly, but I didn't see this
> change quickly.   Otherwise SHA224 is identical to SHA2-256, I think.

I had also wondered about that. The changes seems to be from

https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid2270