IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] List of "semantic" changes between 4880 and bis

Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> Tue, 06 October 2020 05:04 UTC

Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CFE43A1114 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 22:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.306
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.306 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=fifthhorseman.net header.b=r8tReSUr; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fifthhorseman.net header.b=HsnxsFwK
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ym5fMLPkFBVo for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 22:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from che.mayfirst.org (unknown [162.247.75.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9ABE3A0C9B for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 22:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019; t=1601960642; h=from : to : cc : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=j1tHhUfj9WzQat7W04h64Qv+vuU5yy6QwUOP/Ra8Sq4=; b=r8tReSUrWFaCHEncZFsUO1IotnyBpttTGp8uoelvh9uXDn1S6n9dfgz3wfp+yg9owywhj de9mEkjqEr/aewhBw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019rsa; t=1601960642; h=from : to : cc : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=j1tHhUfj9WzQat7W04h64Qv+vuU5yy6QwUOP/Ra8Sq4=; b=HsnxsFwKDvQ29DEDenFr8WuaPy6/A8i21viTAt6ukP/ufkykk08++0dZGwe22gWprUk+K GLxiLb9VUqaIjmJJEZ/BzC/HxJjKYwT+osS1CPVESFKXUQGyMPlJ7JV194vVro9Rq9wvtvb 2LIanjwAdZjNNp22vheLWZddt31jJ19kMEqiM0s5moRa7kE0Kd29m1BSro/Ph0OdOzmDSvE G8bQD1Gk2QruZs6JUuY2s/Ez7xrCn+6LViqBV9fgcP27VAhKNMqVWaZq7HSN6Rt7EgcgBei vpURnRnI+7CEfTM0XuvI6hrKRDFfY9PoL/cc+JtgtYo6XHoSL9jw0RG0+TTw==
Received: from fifthhorseman.net (unknown [108.58.6.98]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC4A7F9A5; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 01:04:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4A65B2036E; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 01:03:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
To: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz <wiktor@metacode.biz>
Cc: "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <87v9frgohm.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
References: <f96533af-a205-05dd-2f03-f8321dde427a@metacode.biz> <87v9frgohm.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
Autocrypt: addr=dkg@fifthhorseman.net; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEXEK/AhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAr/gSROcn+6m8ijTN0DV9AahoHGafy52RRkhCZVwxhEe0K0Rh bmllbCBLYWhuIEdpbGxtb3IgPGRrZ0BmaWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldD6ImQQTFggAQQIbAQULCQgH AgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAIZARYhBMS8Lds4zOlkhevpwvIGkReQOOXGBQJd5Hw3BQkFpJWB AAoJEPIGkReQOOXGDYEA/j0ERjPxDleKMZ2LDcWc/3o5cLFwAVzBKQHppu0Be5IWAP0aeTnyEqlp RTE7M8zugwkhYeUYfYu0BjecDUMnYz6iDLgzBF3kewUWCSsGAQQB2kcPAQEHQK1IuW0GZmcrs2mx CYMl8IHse0tMF8cP7eBNXevrlx2ZiPUEGBYIACYCGwIWIQTEvC3bOMzpZIXr6cLyBpEXkDjlxgUC XeR7TwUJAiGl/gCBdiAEGRYIAB0WIQQsv6x2UaqQJzY+dXHEDyVUMvKBDwUCXeR7BQAKCRDEDyVU MvKBD7KmAQCHs+7588C4jto6fMje0Nu97zzoppjJM7lrGF2rVnbHvwD+MgmGUbHzPSUrTWnZBQDi /QM595bxNrBA4N1CiXhs2AMJEPIGkReQOOXGpp0BAM7YeBnt/UNvxJAGm4DidSfHU7RDMWe6Tgux HrH21cDkAQC9leNFXJsQ7F2ZniRPHa8CkictcQEKPL8VCWpfe8LbArg4BF3ke5wSCisGAQQBl1UB BQEBB0Cf+EiAXtntQMf51xpqb6uZ5O0eCLAZtkg0SXHjA1JlEwMBCAeIfgQYFggAJhYhBMS8Lds4 zOlkhevpwvIGkReQOOXGBQJd5HucAhsMBQkCIaVkAAoJEPIGkReQOOXGdYcBANYnW7VyL2CncKH1 iO4Zr0IwfdIv6rai1PUHL98pVi3cAP9tMh85CKGDa0Xi/fptQH41meollLW5tLb/bEWMuUNuBQ==
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 01:03:21 -0400
Message-ID: <87k0w4ndye.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/ZdYJuhw0utOed0YzzfCvOzQv4Yg>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] List of "semantic" changes between 4880 and bis
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 05:04:07 -0000

On Sat 2020-10-03 20:20:53 +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Fri,  2 Oct 2020 15:37, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz said:
>
>>> A piece is an atom possibly followed by '*', '+', or '?'.
>>
>> bis:
>>
>>> A piece is an atom possibly followed by '_', '+', or '?'.
>
> Good catch.  That seems to be a bug introduced with the change to the
> new Ruby tool.  In the soruce it is correct:
>
>   A piece is an atom possibly followed by '*', '+', or '?'.  An atom
>   followed by '*' matches a sequence of 0 or more matches of the
>
> Has anyone more experience with that new tool?

I've posted several minor cleanup edits here:

https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/rfc4880bis/-/merge_requests/29

I think that commit 756d8b6a9ba6f3f1e20637a2b628b6984697f022 addresses
the concern discussed above, but the whole series is probably worth applying.

Regards,

     --dkg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email