Re: Multiple signatures in clearsigned messages (was Re: Cleartext Signatures)

[Jon Callas <[e-mail]>]

On 12 Oct 2005, at 4:03 AM, Ian G wrote:

> I would prefer the disclaimer to vaguery to be
> at the beginning because that's how lawyers like
> it.  So, Something like this:
>
>   5.2.1. Signature Types
>
>     There are a number of possible meanings for a signature, which
>     may be indicated in a signature type octet in any given signature.
>     Please note that the vagueness of these meanings is
>     not a flaw, but a feature of the system. Because OpenPGP places
>     final authority for validity upon the receiver of a
>     signature, it may be that one signer's casual
>     act might be more rigorous than some other authority's
>     positive act.
>
>     These meanings are:
>

That's in -16 now.

	Jon