IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] Proposed Patch to RFC4880bis to reserve two public key numbers

Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> Thu, 07 July 2016 06:27 UTC

Return-Path: <wk@gnupg.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE9412D0F1 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 23:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dMU2uVg5qgbs for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 23:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kerckhoffs.g10code.com (kerckhoffs.g10code.com [IPv6:2001:aa8:fff1:100::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD66212D0E5 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 23:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uucp by kerckhoffs.g10code.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) id 1bL2m6-0004zL-Fw for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 08:27:02 +0200
Received: from wk by wheatstone.g10code.de with local (Exim 4.84 #3 (Debian)) id 1bL2jS-0000xd-M1; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 08:24:18 +0200
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
To: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
References: <sjmfuuoymp8.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <sjmr3b6pceb.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org>
Organisation: g10 Code GmbH
X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text.
OpenPGP: url=https://k.gnupg.net/80615870F5BAD690333686D0F2AD85AC1E42B367
Mail-Followup-To: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>, openpgp@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 08:24:18 +0200
In-Reply-To: <sjmr3b6pceb.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> (Derek Atkins's message of "Wed, 06 Jul 2016 19:36:28 -0400")
Message-ID: <87vb0iotil.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/bO0AJrPxxBdNWKGm4XOEBe433f4>
Cc: openpgp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Proposed Patch to RFC4880bis to reserve two public key numbers
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 06:27:07 -0000

On Thu,  7 Jul 2016 01:36, derek@ihtfp.com said:
> Hi,
>
> Now that we've accepted the draft, I'd like to re-open this proposal to
> reserve two public-key algorithm protocol numbers.  Note (again) that

I opened an issue to track this proposal:
 https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/rfc4880bis/issues/1


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
 /* Join us at OpenPGP.conf  <https://openpgp-conf.org> */

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status