IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] Fingerprint schemes versus what to fingerprint

Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> Tue, 12 April 2016 16:30 UTC

Return-Path: <wk@gnupg.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0AF12E4D4 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 68SvE0MLIl1Y for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kerckhoffs.g10code.com (kerckhoffs.g10code.com [IPv6:2001:aa8:fff1:100::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0962C12E470 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uucp by kerckhoffs.g10code.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) id 1aq1Cr-0003TI-Fy for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 18:30:25 +0200
Received: from wk by wheatstone.g10code.de with local (Exim 4.84 #3 (Debian)) id 1aq1At-0007QS-L7; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 18:28:23 +0200
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
To: Bill Frantz <frantz@pwpconsult.com>
References: <r470Ps-10114i-A10719748E97459586178687076BE0F4@Williams-MacBook-Pro.local>
Organisation: g10 Code GmbH
X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text.
OpenPGP: url=https://k.gnupg.net/80615870F5BAD690333686D0F2AD85AC1E42B367
Mail-Followup-To: Bill Frantz <frantz@pwpconsult.com>, openpgp@ietf.org, Bryan Ford <brynosaurus@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 18:28:23 +0200
In-Reply-To: <r470Ps-10114i-A10719748E97459586178687076BE0F4@Williams-MacBook-Pro.local> (Bill Frantz's message of "Thu, 7 Apr 2016 12:59:05 -0700")
Message-ID: <874mb6hjvc.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/fZoUbJRsW3TETnrEm-xrD0GelEM>
Cc: openpgp@ietf.org, Bryan Ford <brynosaurus@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Fingerprint schemes versus what to fingerprint
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:30:29 -0000

On Thu,  7 Apr 2016 21:59, frantz@pwpconsult.com said:

> fingerprints, so a fingerprint from one application can be input to
> another application for verification (a very good idea Werner), or in

That was not my idea, someone told me that they implemented it in their
software.


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner


-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email