Return-Path: X-Original-To: openpgp@mail2.ietf.org Delivered-To: openpgp@mail2.ietf.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657AF1281A5F9 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2026 14:23:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1786483415; bh=jeAhxEageiNFxkDuwD73QbMjh7yXU/vQH8BX1h4W5+g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=n1WMFlCzkm38jW/dwRo3n523p5jEz/dkvbA6Wp6wmemqA2FYJzkog6pJ+u/U1pn/E OIoNsUSaQO8OxVAI6bUQL+AakNQeJSeytbkpg6dwEmUw6y5LM46DSxkmDK9bqNfmEq Er7iWRiGW1rKNjWxCdoaDvP/thKNgrIlQe0QEPxQ= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=fifthhorseman.net header.b="5UoAYeLe"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fifthhorseman.net header.b="2e7l0aRj" Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5y-Y0op9Qm03 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2026 14:23:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [IPv6:2001:470:1:116::7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCAA01281A5E4 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2026 14:23:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019; t=1786483406; h=from : to : cc : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=jeAhxEageiNFxkDuwD73QbMjh7yXU/vQH8BX1h4W5+g=; b=5UoAYeLegPt0GbiR+JHGFsXAfPr4kQBpokgmCk6jXRLg/FgIhDEbWcZu4JqbUAvyzxE3v y5g4j9Gi2hxOIdtCA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019rsa; t=1786483406; h=from : to : cc : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=jeAhxEageiNFxkDuwD73QbMjh7yXU/vQH8BX1h4W5+g=; b=2e7l0aRjwGPmGSK28Bxoqro2W7LVTVRYsxNP29VdzhvLxdCwH5NZLY+nt9SIULKkTOtyL dqE7m0sqC0GNTXkMWnypVYoSpyM/FHEBoBYm0FTqQY2MwrZnH3OH7E/RgXuz2YDUEPRQ/pd 2a8usrU4aEt8ZaT8xAcWIDu/RVqSTFEQGAXQ9z9LwPVIrTO2+EHXwQpOQ9r9813dhbRID7B 8iNYqr1vP+EjH5d5Z9HLRd3L49cLtSqDSmq+j8XEHCC87BQ91SXnssbL82N2rv6X5BBYlMp 0wRagSX30Wypvv63sZ0TogRnWSuwTT/zlNJg6in66dBuJEbZFvSKiJndCIlA== Received: from fifthhorseman.net (unknown [IPv6:2603:7080:e63f:a485:f53e:d125:9e82:2995]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C1788F949; Tue, 11 Aug 2026 17:23:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0CB1413F702; Tue, 11 Aug 2026 17:23:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org In-Reply-To: <178637980026.11.2946600653801745379@rfc-editor.org> References: <178637980026.11.2946600653801745379@rfc-editor.org> Autocrypt: addr=dkg@fifthhorseman.net; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xjMEZXEJyxYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdA5BpbW0bpl5qCng/RiqwhQINrplDMSS5JsO/YO+5Zi7HNFzxk a2dAZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ+wsARBBMWCgB5AwsJB0cUAAAAAAAeACBzYWx0QG5vdGF0aW9u cy5zZXF1b2lhLXBncC5vcmcS78JIJ7JbALqPiKEmva7/Pp16WwXWm9hbe5+B/UvnfwMVCggCmwEC HgEWIQTUdwQMcMIValwphUm7fpEBSV5r9wUCZadfkAUJBdnwRQAKCRC7fpEBSV5r9yNXAP442N0c zvisBroQSKKpo+OWm2JpnEJWoVheeJvoRtkBGQEA+edHylby8IGcNccq7rmM2rAXdofvrU1o6qow V+mmDwbOMwRnio4OFgkrBgEEAdpHDwEBB0Cw9HzJFl9lZn3UBaUqSMSgxjcdbd0MwNVcGZ8t8wdN EcLAvwQYFgoBMQWCZ4qODgkQu36RAUlea/dHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3RhdGlvbnMuc2VxdW9p YS1wZ3Aub3JnhcN+tn41cAg01Kk56zcAfpdsh8j98PDe00mqKPfFvaYCmwK+oAQZFgoAbwWCZ4qO DgkQeAuFTtnCtJZHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3RhdGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3JnxsD8Sk5P Wgx8c/Zseo6OlCjyDC+Ogm17gTaUUIpxjWYWIQRjrBGOWy5dZsiKhad4C4VO2cK0lgAAdcQA/1RG dmrmvVxkBY2qNPjtERNwPga8Pf4IdlenrZ03NXM4AQC+TDHMpD7d5obEvUy8GYI3oThzYItPP8vv ChY+wbaIBRYhBNR3BAxwwhVqXCmFSbt+kQFJXmv3AAAKbgD+K1MZXnRKPdmA8DgNysyGRZY8cSVH HQcC7ZAAtV3i2+wA/0CyOYrbFYbyTRALgoERR07OHFoP+fJopQLMNQARVUELzjgEZ4qN+RIKKwYB BAGXVQEFAQEHQDTGlR+Qmn334e+bPqvojJVdFsiBf0leAAHP+ESqop8NAwEIB8LAAAQYFgoAcgWC Z4qN+QkQu36RAUlea/dHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3RhdGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3JnA5Lw b3wOOcoodImuVNw4PYq1U65FDC1Q2JMFIcJXqF0CmwwWIQTUdwQMcMIValwphUm7fpEBSV5r9wAA 6egA/j3QANSmogZ5VTF5KlI+BBye9ud/w9j7RLcCHU6u8AA1AQC3FGaNuv+uWOSa+eeEoI/aZrGd X5el8b/m6aXDDxDjDg== Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 17:23:13 -0400 Message-ID: <87qzk4jqri.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Message-ID-Hash: U3M5LHFFQISNANWI4IOMAYQMTNP2C5GN X-Message-ID-Hash: U3M5LHFFQISNANWI4IOMAYQMTNP2C5GN X-MailFrom: dkg@fifthhorseman.net X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-openpgp.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: justus@sequoia-pgp.org, gniibe@fsij.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, daniel.huigens@proton.ch, nmalykh@protokols.ru, openpgp@ietf.org, paul.wouters@aiven.io X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6 Precedence: list Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5Bopenpgp=5D_Re=3A_=5BEditorial_Errata_Reported=5D_RFC9580_=28909?= =?utf-8?q?4=29?= List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On Mon 2026-08-10 16:36:40 +0000, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9580, > "OpenPGP" > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://errata.rfc-editor.org/eid9094/ [...] > Notes > ----- > RFC 8017 describes PKCS#1 v2.2, not PKCS#1 v2.1 This appears to be correct, and i think we should approve this erratum. https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8017/#page-77 says that this is the only change from 2.1 to 2.2: ~~~ Version 2.2: Version 2.2 updates the list of allowed hashing algorithms to align them with FIPS 180-4 [SHS], therefore adding SHA-224, SHA-512/224, and SHA-512/256. The following substantive changes were made: * Object identifiers for sha224WithRSAEncryption, sha512-224WithRSAEncryption, and sha512-256WithRSAEncryption were added. * This version continues to support the schemes in version 2.1. ~~~ Does anyone else have a different understanding? Regards, --dkg --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wr0EARYKAG8Fgmp7ksEJEHgLhU7ZwrSWRxQAAAAAAB4AIHNhbHRAbm90YXRpb25z LnNlcXVvaWEtcGdwLm9yZ43UuEkvH+P1R5xmII0EkIPjhPAIA9LaeSEmWOVnLrZN FiEEY6wRjlsuXWbIioWneAuFTtnCtJYAANfuAQCWio1VL7cIWV7LsG8O+FntHrQO nHhhykvMsn2aSqeG+QD/UDagZPGo1Bv9RZY+efJmzRG+NfX3E+WX56+0Ezhm3wc= =wDZk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--