[openpgp] Re: Signing-only primary keys

Wiktor Kwapisiewicz <wiktor@metacode.biz> Mon, 05 May 2025 11:31 UTC

Message-ID: <8f93b706-40e2-406b-8e9a-c987cdde82a4@metacode.biz>
Date: Mon, 05 May 2025 13:31:05 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
References: <7d94d70b-fd18-4a0f-b656-d2936aa09578@metacode.biz> <87r019grt9.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
Content-Language: en-US, pl-PL
From: Wiktor Kwapisiewicz <wiktor@metacode.biz>
Organization: Metacode
In-Reply-To: <87r019grt9.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID-Hash: GGK4PX2JJSSFCCHVHFWQX4DINS5AVKDV
CC: "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
Precedence: list
Subject: [openpgp] Re: Signing-only primary keys
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/gKJcA8ujfOq5UpBuPD0ndi4RykA>

Hi,

On 1.05.2025 01:20, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Andrew Gallagher opened a request for a new test like that here:
> 
>     https://gitlab.com/sequoia-pgp/openpgp-interoperability-test-suite/-/issues/160
> 
> Maybe someone wants to nudge the interop test suite in that direction?
> It should be pretty easily discoverable with `sop validate-userid`.

Thanks for the link. I was not aware there's already something.

I think there are at least two tests that could be added:
   - check if `sop validate-userid` takes into account presence or 
absence of the C flag
   - check if `sop verify` works even if the C flag is absent on the 
primary key

I'd like to add these but, as usual, time constraints are tight :( We'll 
see.

Kind regards,
Wiktor

[openpgp] Signing-only primary keys Wiktor Kwapisiewicz
[openpgp] Re: Signing-only primary keys Paul Schaub
[openpgp] Re: Signing-only primary keys Wiktor Kwapisiewicz
[openpgp] Re: Signing-only primary keys Daniel Kahn Gillmor
[openpgp] Re: Signing-only primary keys Wiktor Kwapisiewicz