Re: [openpgp] Proposal for a separable ring signature scheme compatible with RSA, DSA, and ECDSA keys

Ben Laurie <ben@links.org> Mon, 17 March 2014 07:43 UTC

Return-Path: <benlaurie@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B81DB1A03B8 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 00:43:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wcN7WhLhQv3j for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 00:43:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x230.google.com (mail-qc0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589B61A03B5 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 00:43:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f176.google.com with SMTP id m20so5448849qcx.7 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 00:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=/i89jV5aI1UWcBXKl2eahCYSAj/4aeKtD/nZKIoN42Q=; b=VAJD5fClHcXCTbJd6gMdHJQjhqPty9lai2nLZquM3AIL8v07EM02J68euIcuGLALbu Q6Xt87/to6iGW4XPK4U1pAaJdfcYepErwJNl4stpM5WCe8eJhvti9OAHYo0HvN+uRBxb gAmds8+PKUnJddNGVRdV57eOPv8WoBnyJkVCe9f3g0B85+jcBR75wj2vpIv+YuArEruT 3KGHyJBLShddkCzfmbalPbvKA5cUGlmZfiocGltMKLW1WxW/K201s5V7mKh/pviqAme4 V7VE7kmI2ypNUhANiYOMhKJbW+00HwxZqCseEYS0zOvAeylRMei1p2uBZ4gJiUla99g9 2aDQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.229.219.133 with SMTP id hu5mr26508272qcb.5.1395042223365; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 00:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: benlaurie@gmail.com
Received: by 10.96.157.137 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 00:43:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87iordwakp.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de>
References: <80674820640dbeb5ae81f81c67d87541@smtp.hushmail.com> <8761nh1549.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de> <a6d56e791a2c878f34369abc6f09b71d@smtp.hushmail.com> <87y50cybh3.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de> <53233BD4.4020804@fifthhorseman.net> <87lhwcy93w.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de> <CAG5KPzxa=HR9LZ6UfnZhMqUmrEF28stmpHi2psAH0amewf-5Cg@mail.gmail.com> <87iordwakp.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 07:43:42 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: xWzFtNIkCRgTA-cOZp0KrEuLuXI
Message-ID: <CAG5KPzzuouEVqPd_AWey9r7n=+dDBVRkAPPfE0WfObLsR=V6Wg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Laurie <ben@links.org>
To: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/gUoeqRD9Ehmyy2SRODiR9l27X_M
Cc: openpgp@ietf.org, Vincent Yu <v@v-yu.com>, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Proposal for a separable ring signature scheme compatible with RSA, DSA, and ECDSA keys
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 07:43:54 -0000

On 17 March 2014 07:25, Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Mar 2014 10:54, ben@links.org said:
>
>> So if I want to deny that I'm the one that made a ring signature, I
>> make sure I only use the new s/w for ring signatures. Then probability
>> says its not me, according to you.
>
> Right, you would decrease the probability that you created it.

Clearly not.