Re: [openpgp] Manifesto - who is the new OpenPGP for?

Falcon Darkstar Momot <falcon@iridiumlinux.org> Wed, 25 March 2015 08:05 UTC

Return-Path: <falcon@iridiumlinux.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C21B1ACE09 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 01:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5cWc6q-5Z1NC for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 01:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.iridiumlinux.org (akira.iridiumlinux.org [184.70.203.174]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 081221ACE02 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 01:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by smtp.iridiumlinux.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 6A1FF13F40BD; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 02:04:33 -0600 (MDT)
X-Spam-ASN:
Received: from [192.168.0.5] (c-24-143-80-128.customer.broadstripe.net [24.143.80.128]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.iridiumlinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3121214FA0B5 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 02:04:32 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <55126C0D.30807@iridiumlinux.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 01:04:29 -0700
From: Falcon Darkstar Momot <falcon@iridiumlinux.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: openpgp@ietf.org
References: <CAA7UWsUz65C0GAQo8Yf7ZOeT9BYy+NLV5pbbPg+Ok0-72ca1eA@mail.gmail.com> <1426721882.4249.72.camel@scientia.net> <5510578A.80304@iang.org> <1427140788.10191.75.camel@scientia.net> <5510B7CF.8060308@iang.org> <1427168189.10191.241.camel@scientia.net> <5511FE82.6010807@iang.org> <CAMm+Lwho7Ri0X6hDBoN4gJvBLkNJ+0UufKketgSK3FFBbgtFUg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+Lwho7Ri0X6hDBoN4gJvBLkNJ+0UufKketgSK3FFBbgtFUg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms070505060600060803040304"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/hwULa3dG4ff1AwXqk9IFZPpE-gU>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Manifesto - who is the new OpenPGP for?
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 08:05:06 -0000

In all seriousness, attempts to create useability for any target
audience by committee are probably doomed (even though what we have now
is balked at even by a lot of security professionals).  PoC something first.

--Falcon Darkstar Momot
--Shadytel

On 24/03/2015 21:06, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> The Internet is for Everyone.
>
> 7.125 billion or go home.
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:17 PM, ianG <iang@iang.org> wrote:
>> On 24/03/2015 03:36 am, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
>>
>>> Long story short:
>>> I don't think that OpenPGP was ever the system of the masses, and
>>> perhaps it even shouldn't be.
>>
>>
>> OK!  Now that's the beginnings of a manifesto.  It's a position, plain and
>> simple.
>>
>> I think differently - I think a system that doesn't target the masses is
>> doomed.
>>
>> What do others think?
>>
>> This is no light question, it could decide who participates, what the
>> security model is, how 'hard' it is, where the compromises are found ... and
>> decide its ultimate success.
>>
>>
>>
>> iang
>>
>>
>>
>> ps; this was taken from the other thread, plenty of actual argumentation in
>> that too, but I know most will not read for length.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openpgp mailing list
>> openpgp@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp
> _______________________________________________
> openpgp mailing list
> openpgp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp