IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] v5 in the crypto-refresh draft

Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> Mon, 28 June 2021 14:14 UTC

Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15F63A0977 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 07:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.306
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.306 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=fifthhorseman.net header.b=67JJOW6R; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fifthhorseman.net header.b=ZT7i7cm/
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n53QHyxQG4j7 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 07:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from che.mayfirst.org (unknown [162.247.75.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09F1C3A0994 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 07:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019; t=1624889649; h=from : to : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=MAvrIzwfBMVVhpgO4xeC/i6T64UkXjDcvm9mZiEfipA=; b=67JJOW6REURoRDIczOMSP8+uotXh1W8Rn9uNN33IFIyNXMtY1H1YQUGcQA8i7u/qKRHQh TeztrGhos5NVp/oCg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019rsa; t=1624889649; h=from : to : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=MAvrIzwfBMVVhpgO4xeC/i6T64UkXjDcvm9mZiEfipA=; b=ZT7i7cm/EBE982DaH8L6M+DE11BSRdtGmHdECZnSh5nUF9kk0NYZqaPUfrNhaYZ6yqbeF KySl2lZQkRQvGhKwVrzL/SpNqZa9xoDP2YKbTzkxGkCR2+44JRq5I7GWwgyliesPzL1Q4dA xxv3SwcHzzxSUOXpgPggYvccH/R0EV7kuCt9Mo1TeM7hOEVy3BdVXjq9cfUmWb9R5gYcwWx 2wwyXgAmkQBBgNTwMiV6CsNOtJ1U7/KiYBVfyCT0yH5g2JDNtRf7n1bs0Sxa0oiXTCe1xfX tyoBSjEtl/26ij6db0zDsWQ1RWJuUyvNkTfXbgC8sirUPtPyZ+UbV++bDiDQ==
Received: from fifthhorseman.net (c-73-106-144-119.hsd1.ga.comcast.net [73.106.144.119]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C6FBF9A5; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 10:14:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6D8D2203D8; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 09:25:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
To: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>, "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <SY4PR01MB62514F3D266BB726CD378A40EE049@SY4PR01MB6251.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com>
References: <SY4PR01MB6251ADA05B055670FCFF080CEE359@SY4PR01MB6251.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com> <871r8rwavo.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <SY4PR01MB62514F3D266BB726CD378A40EE049@SY4PR01MB6251.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Autocrypt: addr=dkg@fifthhorseman.net; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEX+i03xYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdACA4xvL/xI5dHedcnkfViyq84doe8zFRid9jW7CC9XBiI0QQf FgoAgwWCX+i03wWJBZ+mAAMLCQcJEOCS6zpcoQ26RxQAAAAAAB4AIHNhbHRAbm90YXRpb25zLnNl cXVvaWEtcGdwLm9yZ/tr8E9NA10HvcAVlSxnox6z62KXCInWjZaiBIlgX6O5AxUKCAKbAQIeARYh BMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AADZHQD/Zx9nc3N2kj13AUsKMr/7zekBtgfSIGB3hRCU74Su G44A/34Yp6IAkndewLxb1WdRSokycnaCVyrk0nb4imeAYyoPtBc8ZGtnQGZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4u bmV0PojRBBMWCgCDBYJf6LTfBYkFn6YAAwsJBwkQ4JLrOlyhDbpHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3Rh dGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3JnL0Gwxvypz2tu1IPG+yu1zPjkiZwpscsitwrVvzN3bbADFQoI ApsBAh4BFiEEwp+KDAHzXjTYFqpc4JLrOlyhDboAAPkXAP0Z29z7jW+YzLzPTQML4EQLMbkHOfU4 +s+ki81Czt0WqgD/SJ8RyrqDCtEP8+E4ZSR01ysKqh+MUAsTaJlzZjehiQ24MwRf6LTfFgkrBgEE AdpHDwEBB0DkKHOW2kmqfAK461+acQ49gc2Z6VoXMChRqobGP0ubb4kBiAQYFgoBOgWCX+i03wWJ BZ+mAAkQ4JLrOlyhDbpHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3RhdGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3Jnfvo+ nHoxDwaLaJD8XZuXiaqBNZtIGXIypF1udBBRoc0CmwICHgG+oAQZFgoAbwWCX+i03wkQPp1xc3He VlxHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3RhdGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3JnaheiqE7Pfi3Atb3GGTw+ jFcBGOaobgzEJrhEuFpXREEWIQQttUkcnfDcj0MoY88+nXFzcd5WXAAAvrsBAIJ5sBg8Udocv25N stN/zWOiYpnjjvOjVMLH4fV3pWE1AP9T6hzHz7hRnAA8d01vqoxOlQ3O6cb/kFYAjqx3oMXSBhYh BMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AADX7gD/b83VObe14xrNP8xcltRrBZF5OE1rQSPkMNy+eWpk eCwA/1hxiS8ZxL5/elNjXiWuHXEvUGnRoVj745Vl48sZPVYMuDgEX+i03xIKKwYBBAGXVQEFAQEH QIGex1WZbH6xhUBve5mblScGYU+Y8QJOomXH+rr5tMsMAwEICYjJBBgWCgB7BYJf6LTfBYkFn6YA CRDgkus6XKENukcUAAAAAAAeACBzYWx0QG5vdGF0aW9ucy5zZXF1b2lhLXBncC5vcmcEAx9vTD3b J0SXkhvcRcCr6uIDJwic3KFKxkH1m4QW0QKbDAIeARYhBMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AAAX mwD8CWmukxwskU82RZLMk5fm1wCgMB5z8dA50KLw3rgsCykBAKg1w/Y7XpBS3SlXEegIg1K1e6dR fRxL7Z37WZXoH8AH
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 09:25:46 -0400
Message-ID: <87zgvat92d.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/i9pXbTm4U2YggBjmjY0HidDUo5g>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] v5 in the crypto-refresh draft
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 14:14:25 -0000

On Sun 2021-06-27 15:11:09 +0000, Peter Gutmann wrote:
>>I would welcome a proposal for brief text that describes this use for the
>>revision of RFC 4880
>
> Do you mean the -bis draft or the -refresh draft?  If it's the -refresh draft
> do you have the current text covering fingerprints?  The posted draft -03
> predates the current discussion.

the crypto-refresh draft is the one that is currently being edited.  and
yes, -03 does indeed predate the current discussion -- the discussion is
*about* the changes that were included in -03.

        --dkg

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email