Re: [openpgp] chairs for chartering process

["Christopher LILJENSTOLPE" <[e-mail]>]

Greetings, and thank's Stephen (I think) for the opportunity

	Daniel and I have been talking a bit about the working group, and a 
charter.  We'd like to put some of those ideas to the list for 
discussion.  Ideally, it would be good if we could have some consensus 
about a charter within the next week or two to start the formation 
process.

We would like to scope this WG fairly tightly, therefore:

1) The primary charter goal would be create a RFC4880bis document.
    a) At the end of that process, we would either re-charter, or close.
    b) Other documents (informational or bcp) MAY be entertained by the 
WG, but are not required for the WG to complete it's task, nor    will 
their progress "keep the WG from closing"

2) We will require at least two independent reviews (from within the WG) 
of an individual submission before a document is considered a candidate 
for WG acceptance.  The chairs will help chide reviewers, but we want to 
see interest in the WG in a document before it progresses.

3) We are going to try and run this group virtually as much as possible 
(i.e. we will only physically meet if necessary).

	What do you all think about these as chartering concepts?

	Christopher



On 1 May 2015, at 12:14, Stephen Farrell wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> First - many thanks to all of you who volunteered to help by chairing.
> It's really encouraging that so many were willing and able, which was
> the case for I think everyone who volunteered.
>
> Having spoken to a few folks, I'm delighted to say that Daniel Kahn
> Gillmor and Christopher Liljenstolpe (both cc'd on this) have agreed
> to help out as chairs for the re-formed openpgp WG.
>
> Christopher has lots of experience with chairing in the IETF and dkg
> as you know is very active in lots of security things including PGP
> so I think they should be a great team to help us move forward.
>
> Daniel and Christopher will take it from here with the intent being
> to try craft a charter along the lines we've already discussed on the
> list and I'll start the formal chartering process once they tell me
> that's sufficiently baked (so no need for a BoF before starting). And
> then we all can get moving on getting the work done.
>
> So please join me in thanking Christopher and Daniel for being
> willing to help out and please help them by continuing to contribute
> as constructively as you have collectively been doing.
>
> Cheers and thanks again all,
> Stephen.


--
李柯睿
Avt tace, avt loqvere meliora silentio
Check my PGP key here: http://www.asgaard.org/cdl/cdl.asc
Current vCard here: http://www.asgaard.org/cdl/cdl.vcf