Re: [openpgp] Requesting the editor to step down

Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> Mon, 20 April 2020 12:30 UTC

Return-Path: <wk@gnupg.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DC93A0BFE for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 05:30:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gnupg.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9rpWoCIlcnRe for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 05:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kerckhoffs.g10code.com (kerckhoffs.g10code.com [IPv6:2001:aa8:fff1:100::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB0923A0C01 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 05:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnupg.org; s=20181017; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=D9qRGEHiokZS4JjfjfWLaPdCLJR1CRsZ+yEBtztaSiw=; b=LY6oAWstXK+Hw4myO6v2C18LTD fL/Y7g+MP33SafLPcpG9d+McG7/C+8eoi7Met16xbth8M9hoCb6kW/3oznKFvPGH3MLwbsxEQW9o2 bWyvE6LxpFIXLL2hdfxpFiVPldDCxRCa6XssFFOgn8d2VP7q8KamJuTVsAJJY8lQwoLg=;
Received: from uucp by kerckhoffs.g10code.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.89 #1 (Debian)) id 1jQVYv-00008w-2j for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:30:09 +0200
Received: from wk by wheatstone.g10code.de with local (Exim 4.92 #5 (Debian)) id 1jQVYE-0002Qj-Up; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:29:26 +0200
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
To: Wiktor Kwapisiewicz <wiktor=40metacode.biz@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "openpgp\@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
References: <3J6ZOTPGPXG6Y.2JRNW7TO2C5HZ@my.amazin.horse> <B74328A2-2CC0-4D0A-8C07-E9D52DCC46B3@ribose.com> <871roi5y5f.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> <dd0ec8e8-3b60-79fe-f92d-9c371ce74c35@metacode.biz>
Organisation: GnuPG e.V.
X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text.
Mail-Followup-To: Wiktor Kwapisiewicz <wiktor=40metacode.biz@dmarc.ietf.org>, "openpgp\@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:29:17 +0200
In-Reply-To: <dd0ec8e8-3b60-79fe-f92d-9c371ce74c35@metacode.biz> (Wiktor Kwapisiewicz's message of "Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:29:45 +0200")
Message-ID: <87pnc249ya.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=Freeh_Soviet_oil_Indigo_PLF_SP4_Cocaine_covert_video_Steve_Case_MSEE"; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/jmLhfd3mLiZmGlZRzUWo0Fi6or8>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Requesting the editor to step down
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:30:18 -0000

On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:29, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz said:
> feedback ("The Document Editor is responsible for ensuring that the
> contents of the document accurately reflect the decisions that have been
> made by the working group.").

Please give an example of an _decision_ made here which is not reflected
in the I-Ds.

Vincent seems to complain that I am not checking the GitLab bug tracker.
It is correct that I only rarely look into the bug tracker; however we
also agreed initially that all change requests should be directed to the
mailing list and not silently to some bug tracker.

If relevant changes to -09 have been posted here and I missed to include
them, please be so kind and repost them. 


Shalom-Salam,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.