IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] Weird OIDs in the 4880bis draft

David Runge <dave@sleepmap.de> Wed, 22 February 2023 09:36 UTC

Return-Path: <dave@sleepmap.de>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E547C14CF13 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 01:36:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0vpuKnCmQ1Uf for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 01:36:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.sleepmap.de (sleepmap.de [85.10.206.218]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CB4DC14CF0C for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 01:36:36 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 10:36:27 +0100
From: David Runge <dave@sleepmap.de>
To: openpgp@ietf.org
Message-ID: <Y/XiHjVijntIGISH@hmbx>
References: <SY4PR01MB6251BD1B19BAD5DE910A1C0EEED99@SY4PR01MB6251.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com> <5bbca9f6-9fc5-3e8b-51eb-103637a6a4b5@cs.tcd.ie> <877cwg9n2y.fsf@europ.lan> <87sff4jfrp.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <874jrk9eq9.fsf@europ.lan> <4123011c-ba72-e36f-c3c9-b1da3ed33d85@cs.tcd.ie> <uyfPffB5ZDa2AJavNntu4iKXNnG4m0TlhoaDcT5fAW9lh_QkhKaJiKNAL9kelDovGhUC_xcnTsdfQjPskuXL2Byy323mlgVsR8d8AWxXVz8=@protonmail.com> <cddeb76e-59f7-5abb-e980-5b7bd8c3a419@cs.tcd.ie> <9smwivJ9SgD6TyUrzBwAWZRror46JwRIG5AqFvvCssKV98Gxu3C0H731XgfRyTZwwh4tG0ZDehjXTXX7CpqK4Z9468j_C2mi0TM1QdJRXVA=@protonmail.com> <d0a872ba-d917-0c04-845b-5862a251b444@cs.tcd.ie>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QmLSk6HBmJBgZrnp"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d0a872ba-d917-0c04-845b-5862a251b444@cs.tcd.ie>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/kGfMRZMCo1g8HliubvUPizJ1f1I>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Weird OIDs in the 4880bis draft
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 09:46:34 -0000

On 2023-02-20 19:17:47 (+0000), Stephen Farrell wrote:
> Ok, so given the proponents are now happy with this merge
> request can other people please take a look and express an
> opinion on the list as to whether we should make these
> changes now.
> 
> Please do so by the end of Wednesday if you can.

The changes proposed in !242 look alright (as far as I understand them).

Best,
David

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email