[openpgp] dropping the sample "ascii-armored message"

Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> Tue, 30 May 2023 04:32 UTC

Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98617C151082 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 May 2023 21:32:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.303
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.303 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=fifthhorseman.net header.b="eCKcjtGT"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fifthhorseman.net header.b="NRPq5HBu"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FGmnrBBXPyM7 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 May 2023 21:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from che.mayfirst.org (unknown [162.247.75.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CB34C14CEF9 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 May 2023 21:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019; t=1685421168; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=wQcwmaw71RjZSz5hCg73+dYnrY90ttQlBMJ8B/eqgnw=; b=eCKcjtGTV7INT6l+a1O8+dtMDuZRxmQLytv8m3/+KEPf16MQMqN+9fNj+wLuYQTMdkHyE BQT4XjmHsaVcDRHDQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019rsa; t=1685421168; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=wQcwmaw71RjZSz5hCg73+dYnrY90ttQlBMJ8B/eqgnw=; b=NRPq5HBuILqRmk5i3i6FxnThmXAt+zal1J/CZjXIjiadiy9BJ9OEzD8WY9c7F+8n4l7tk DodW3dhibjz64Kxv7HVYNiPr3oyr4+GWQ5pTLSXGw1kM20zEmE+ZmPwTJMMDvcFe//nCcg3 J3bYX022+4bRYmNbPhWW6WwoZ5X6y3iBITAxPZzIWDHeculvATG76AVb5w8UDGyzw3K93tV L7PEbGjy6g1151X3pR8DRIRpbtTRrmzRSb3y86ZHuDyRmRkp+MtqgXeBgNH8C7txKZimpN8 UkFPVm0ZkhtEtfPxgO1ZNcBSCG89acCf8yd7Uh0giBsySRad6n2AhdiT+GfA==
Received: from fifthhorseman.net (lair.fifthhorseman.net [108.58.6.98]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 515B9F9AD for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 May 2023 00:32:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 046B42055E; Tue, 30 May 2023 00:07:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
To: openpgp@ietf.org
Autocrypt: addr=dkg@fifthhorseman.net; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEX+i03xYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdACA4xvL/xI5dHedcnkfViyq84doe8zFRid9jW7CC9XBiI0QQf FgoAgwWCX+i03wWJBZ+mAAMLCQcJEOCS6zpcoQ26RxQAAAAAAB4AIHNhbHRAbm90YXRpb25zLnNl cXVvaWEtcGdwLm9yZ/tr8E9NA10HvcAVlSxnox6z62KXCInWjZaiBIlgX6O5AxUKCAKbAQIeARYh BMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AADZHQD/Zx9nc3N2kj13AUsKMr/7zekBtgfSIGB3hRCU74Su G44A/34Yp6IAkndewLxb1WdRSokycnaCVyrk0nb4imeAYyoPtBc8ZGtnQGZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4u bmV0PojRBBMWCgCDBYJf6LTfBYkFn6YAAwsJBwkQ4JLrOlyhDbpHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3Rh dGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3JnL0Gwxvypz2tu1IPG+yu1zPjkiZwpscsitwrVvzN3bbADFQoI ApsBAh4BFiEEwp+KDAHzXjTYFqpc4JLrOlyhDboAAPkXAP0Z29z7jW+YzLzPTQML4EQLMbkHOfU4 +s+ki81Czt0WqgD/SJ8RyrqDCtEP8+E4ZSR01ysKqh+MUAsTaJlzZjehiQ24MwRf6LTfFgkrBgEE AdpHDwEBB0DkKHOW2kmqfAK461+acQ49gc2Z6VoXMChRqobGP0ubb4kBiAQYFgoBOgWCX+i03wWJ BZ+mAAkQ4JLrOlyhDbpHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3RhdGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3Jnfvo+ nHoxDwaLaJD8XZuXiaqBNZtIGXIypF1udBBRoc0CmwICHgG+oAQZFgoAbwWCX+i03wkQPp1xc3He VlxHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3RhdGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3JnaheiqE7Pfi3Atb3GGTw+ jFcBGOaobgzEJrhEuFpXREEWIQQttUkcnfDcj0MoY88+nXFzcd5WXAAAvrsBAIJ5sBg8Udocv25N stN/zWOiYpnjjvOjVMLH4fV3pWE1AP9T6hzHz7hRnAA8d01vqoxOlQ3O6cb/kFYAjqx3oMXSBhYh BMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AADX7gD/b83VObe14xrNP8xcltRrBZF5OE1rQSPkMNy+eWpk eCwA/1hxiS8ZxL5/elNjXiWuHXEvUGnRoVj745Vl48sZPVYMuDgEX+i03xIKKwYBBAGXVQEFAQEH QIGex1WZbH6xhUBve5mblScGYU+Y8QJOomXH+rr5tMsMAwEICYjJBBgWCgB7BYJf6LTfBYkFn6YA CRDgkus6XKENukcUAAAAAAAeACBzYWx0QG5vdGF0aW9ucy5zZXF1b2lhLXBncC5vcmcEAx9vTD3b J0SXkhvcRcCr6uIDJwic3KFKxkH1m4QW0QKbDAIeARYhBMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AAAX mwD8CWmukxwskU82RZLMk5fm1wCgMB5z8dA50KLw3rgsCykBAKg1w/Y7XpBS3SlXEegIg1K1e6dR fRxL7Z37WZXoH8AH
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 06:07:15 +0200
Message-ID: <874jnu5uoc.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/kNnXbNHDCtR6GrQRkgFtzN08bKs>
Subject: [openpgp] dropping the sample "ascii-armored message"
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 04:32:54 -0000

Yesterday i reviewed all of the test vectors currently in the draft, and
i'd like to propose dropping the "Example of an ASCII Armored Message".

That's this one:

-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----

yDgBO22WxBHv7O8X7O/jygAEzol56iUKiXmV+XmpCtmpqQUKiQrFqclFqUDBovzS
vBSFjNSiVHsuAA==
-----END PGP MESSAGE-----


This sample message is a ZIP-compressed binary literal data packet that
claims its filename is "_CONSOLE", containing the ASCII text "Can't
anyone keep a secret around here?\n".

This has at least three problems:

 - ZIP isn't a high priority compression algorithm (it's not even
   "SHOULD implement", it's just "SHOULD decompress")

 - The contents of the literal data packet include a unix-style newline,
   but the literal datta packet is marked as binary.

 - The _CONSOLE filename (meaning "for eyes only") is explicitly
   deprecated.  Even if it weren't deprecated, the message is not
   encrypted, and it's deeply weird to say "here is a cleartext message
   for your eyes only".

It's also unclear in the OpenPGP ecosystem where such a packet
sequence would be useful.  For example, it's not encrypted, and it's
not signed.  It's not even well-compressed, since it's got
ASCII-armoring added back onto it.  The original string is shorter!

From the perspective of SOP, SOP doesn't even have a datatype or
subcommand that would be capable of consuming or generate this packet
sequence.  No one has asked for anything like it in SOP, and i can't
imagine a good argument for adding it.

If anything, this particular ASCII-armored message should exist in a
bestiary of "things the OpenPGP spec allows you to create but you really
probably shouldn't".  I don't think such a message belongs as a
highlighted example in the draft.

By contrast, the rest of the draft contains many useful ASCII-armored
OpenPGP test vectors, so i don't think we lose anything with just
cutting this one out.

I've opened a merge request for this non-substantive change:

   https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/rfc4880bis/-/merge_requests/315

      --dkg