IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] lack of agenda items...

"Neal H. Walfield" <neal@walfield.org> Thu, 03 November 2022 07:34 UTC

Return-Path: <neal@walfield.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBF4C14CF08; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 00:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.904
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.904 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id loR7U8VdgJLM; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 00:34:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.dasr.de (mail.dasr.de [202.61.250.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2754C14CF00; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 00:34:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p5de92f23.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.233.47.35] helo=forster.huenfield.org) by mail.dasr.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <neal@walfield.org>) id 1oqUkG-0001gM-Ir; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 08:34:36 +0100
Received: from grit.huenfield.org ([192.168.20.9] helo=grit.walfield.org) by forster.huenfield.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <neal@walfield.org>) id 1oqUkF-004oOw-Pk; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 08:34:36 +0100
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2022 08:34:35 +0100
Message-ID: <87a658lcdw.wl-neal@walfield.org>
From: "Neal H. Walfield" <neal@walfield.org>
To: Daniel Huigens <d.huigens=40protonmail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <49O_0HJ65X78GDB09nBKcdWl3GxD5gVeCrWSNSEB4Jq08w3GRVUe1eUEr4wOmilsDf5F0eQaSc0fhgGhYTitOC6ofO6_yz7HiScPXBiZdtQ=@protonmail.com>
References: <c859b8da-5fd6-297b-f30b-39805e3e3cad@cs.tcd.ie> <49O_0HJ65X78GDB09nBKcdWl3GxD5gVeCrWSNSEB4Jq08w3GRVUe1eUEr4wOmilsDf5F0eQaSc0fhgGhYTitOC6ofO6_yz7HiScPXBiZdtQ=@protonmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/27.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.20.9
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: neal@walfield.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on forster.huenfield.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/nZCQUwznow5joMxkZzyOIRqc_Eo>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] lack of agenda items...
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2022 07:34:46 -0000

On Wed, 02 Nov 2022 18:11:33 +0100,
Daniel Huigens wrote:
> For example, do we want to bump keys and signatures to v6?

If we are willing to bump the keys and signatures to v6, then I'd like
the WG to also reconsider the use of the AEAD chunk size parameter.

  https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/6uErnTyz7lnHt_s1dffQGfzkJRA

Neal

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status