IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] sample v5 secret key material

Daniel Huigens <d.huigens@protonmail.com> Wed, 30 November 2022 16:44 UTC

Return-Path: <d.huigens@protonmail.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95C3C14F743 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 08:44:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H7Oe1Nzc8RWH for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 08:44:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-4316.protonmail.ch (mail-4316.protonmail.ch [185.70.43.16]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 287F0C1522C6 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 08:44:28 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 16:44:19 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1669826666; x=1670085866; bh=0X3Llhcq8h3rBDcEuwAC7owjliqcZv/7q8I3ts/WzfI=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=Tu0KMkYKIl9SdcfX+44s/GeLrwPZze9NM+28QZHsdOF49ecDB3oCn89jd2eFsZOEf P6FtH4cDNWqUELpEt8fnUXxWn7W7GC2qlxPYFMRe3BbzkTEYUaVk4KfkUqv/+UbJdv TX5LB+S/LTjlMvNwjQrJBUWca9DCKv+oenZaMmbaM/efkza6ElGJbLUhj+pH9iobbQ HGTw8MTtqN6Vi9Ccq1N6jpccz+MwMl2yoNVAOeUxYG5IUmXaoyEw02laRsaB2igeix m+lAlP/iJX/TEcNfKDlreGtLg/xht9iLLn3FlufUhOrsu+2S2YcQFsU4vXPLrfQ0Zi 9iXCPIKVf6DCg==
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
From: Daniel Huigens <d.huigens@protonmail.com>
Cc: openpgp@ietf.org
Message-ID: <9EnIfqqPVxtAFfUhjtLKeiQrxIpJZ50mvJDs-0Jwlg_OhltVdRYvw5GQW1CS-OJZc0prBi7QvwokbS-Zsit8oJqt18zEY4wMTxnydZTVb6s=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <vqLkGjU9bVLkzxVuVP4q6eLMYsIsCAEticXH9YQZ3y40uQfrNBpSicOP464RkqJCbqPsUFcOl9hKTBMQdD6KKLKejxown9g84ZBepeW5zK0=@protonmail.com>
References: <87v8n2u512.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <mH2Q8Hy8GJFYnn3PtaOC9S7BnWq1HOPX95MS1VAD8fO7vaJP6ZFTuB0GmkDKg0L7i_3fsBk59QZbbq01LtTpXRdJ8FIb70PAWOBpwcSwVHY=@protonmail.com> <vqLkGjU9bVLkzxVuVP4q6eLMYsIsCAEticXH9YQZ3y40uQfrNBpSicOP464RkqJCbqPsUFcOl9hKTBMQdD6KKLKejxown9g84ZBepeW5zK0=@protonmail.com>
Feedback-ID: 2934448:user:proton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/pGKbjPvUhWBgoMtJH_sm73cyVrg>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] sample v5 secret key material
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 16:44:57 -0000

Oh, and I realized these still have the armor checksums, those should be
removed, of course.

Best,
Daniel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email