Return-Path: <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93DF112D9DF
 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.626
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.626 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
 header.d=auckland.ac.nz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id H0Wx_ut-SIef for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.auckland.ac.nz (mx4.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.125.248])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED02C12D9DB
 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:02:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;
 d=auckland.ac.nz; i=@auckland.ac.nz; q=dns/txt; s=mail;
 t=1466190129; x=1497726129;
 h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references:
 in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version;
 bh=SxXKDGUjA3q949ruLC50qNHSp2CVaNcgvxstOMDKiF8=;
 b=FE3ZZaGsVLyl67tWCGnfFBfF80S5MZW+BTBs8bhEkExtf2vdbAgNctzi
 l/dlsmL4W0QplG0fSqFgvuVA9FeNgDtsnMDuZNDto1Zdj9BB5Lu1bQscv
 7vxf3mRdmp9t13STAsbIFDHUskH3a/1iZO45D+Y5/9klf3tDTuV0YHw+m
 yxH1NP/C456a2EcPLkU9zLXWtAcnUozOM9sZfsh40wlFxUm2Ivu/nDqaC
 KFiyASYQdQMStbbuCDT/OoNRBDBOGS5GpPe/24hGYEhd0L8Swy5/o0HR2
 E2aytCV6Qap+ipRYKqYvAmSqi+5pVAQqAcqkgKXRU0P66IZVTKApaJwl8 Q==;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,484,1459771200"; d="scan'208";a="91977715"
X-Ironport-HAT: MAIL-SERVERS - $RELAYED
X-Ironport-Source: 130.216.4.171 - Outgoing - Outgoing
Received: from uxchange10-fe4.uoa.auckland.ac.nz ([130.216.4.171])
 by mx4-int.auckland.ac.nz with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 18 Jun 2016 07:02:07 +1200
Received: from UXCN10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz ([169.254.5.93]) by
 uxchange10-fe4.UoA.auckland.ac.nz ([169.254.109.63]) with mapi id
 14.03.0266.001; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 07:02:06 +1200
From: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
To: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>, Vincent Breitmoser <look@my.amazin.horse>
Thread-Topic: [openpgp] Issuer Fingerprint
Thread-Index: AQHRxVv+XkgLTKRZjUCqSa/FVCgLe5/oG7mAgADZDYD//zg6gIAA326vgAT9/1Y=
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 19:02:05 +0000
Message-ID: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4CA3941@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>
References: <87mvmp5rmi.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
 <CABtrr-Vrv-S_2htPECqLR+Butqr9GzwvPaXfqEyW2fBRW__o_w@mail.gmail.com>
 <87mvmnyknu.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
 <20160614132705.GA28122@littlepip.fritz.box>,
 <8760tbygok.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
In-Reply-To: <8760tbygok.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
Accept-Language: en-NZ, en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-NZ
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.6.2.5]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/qG0TFy4wmrEDvzFP5X1YySR5tpA>
Cc: "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>, Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Issuer Fingerprint
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>,
 <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>,
 <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 19:02:17 -0000

Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> writes:=0A=
=0A=
>I strongly disagree for OpenPGP.  The MUSTs, SHOULDs, and MAYs have been=
=0A=
>carefully designed and implemented in a sensible way.  Thus there are no r=
eal=0A=
>world interoperability problems between OpenPGP implementations.=0A=
=0A=
Uhh, I'll have to disagree (strongly) with that, perhaps from the point of =
GPG=0A=
this is true since it's the de facto reference implementation that everyone=
=0A=
makes their code compatible with, but when you need to interop across non-G=
PG=0A=
implementations it can get pretty hairy, I've had to reverse-engineer sourc=
e=0A=
code and create instrumented versions of other apps that hex-dump data so I=
=0A=
can see what they're doing.  I've also had to do that with GPG on a couple =
of=0A=
occasions where the spec was unclear on which data needed to be processed i=
n=0A=
which way.  I assume that a lot, if not all, the code out there is written =
to=0A=
be compatible with the GPG de facto profile, in the same way that SSH code =
is=0A=
written to be compatible with the OpenSSH (server) and Putty (client) de fa=
cto=0A=
profiles.=0A=
=0A=
Peter.=

