Re: [openpgp] Clarification re subkey binding sigs?
Andrew Gallagher <andrewg@andrewg.com> Fri, 19 May 2023 08:44 UTC
Return-Path: <andrewg@andrewg.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB16FC151527 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 May 2023 01:44:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=andrewg.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z8nQnwpNTVRo for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 May 2023 01:44:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fum.andrewg.com (fum.andrewg.com [135.181.198.78]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E298C15152F for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 May 2023 01:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:fc93:5820:7349:eda2:99a7::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fum.andrewg.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C4995F73D; Fri, 19 May 2023 08:44:27 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=andrewg.com; s=andrewg-com; t=1684485867; bh=W0dGn7cvvtnkrd8Z2oorhJlZzi19XSgNwCMafVEEX+I=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=b5TYwQMSVQGrKdHfANiU0bQPIuMKQR94PhEA/74YpUSyVCmO+GaZQAjz0M8JS3GGS tlXqP55/cnoResmEj13uau83UG4Ww+vGnELUsRya1EZvGIrq8R8791u7G8XLEnYlPm yKev0Ch+Iyz2fzle+ttaT4GN+138ledzWmfHK2PP2E45PYPPe+Ld+MZwX4ufI8KA3I Z8T51D7EIVodTFwSads6Kyzh/rvrMJcntiTIVHrUU+co1ALzApB1W8RDak75HtvDNK EhXD684UqOwcQFu42V6ODZ22UhygIprIcrcum7xyf0vrOG257U7/2zev3cpX6ag8Ma 4Li/52L8o0SsQ==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_92FBFF38-9B5B-49B7-9747-AEFE69D11917"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.400.51.1.1\))
From: Andrew Gallagher <andrewg@andrewg.com>
In-Reply-To: <87sfbth1qc.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 09:44:10 +0100
Cc: IETF OpenPGP WG <openpgp@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <D85F1D98-78E6-4B0E-B38E-347E697D9A5F@andrewg.com>
References: <EC32FB38-DD71-4DE1-8E9D-70E5D3DD2E9D@andrewg.com> <87sfbth1qc.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.400.51.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/qTQjMIDxNmUI2Npkl633OYvQRCA>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Clarification re subkey binding sigs?
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 08:44:35 -0000
On 18 May 2023, at 20:35, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> wrote: > > Hi Andrew-- > > I think the textual changes you're suggesting below are simple > clarifications of text that is already present in the draft, and make no > substantive changes. > > That said, this kind of editorial cleanup and clarification is useful! Thanks for the MR, LGTM :-) A
- [openpgp] Clarification re subkey binding sigs? Andrew Gallagher
- Re: [openpgp] Clarification re subkey binding sig… Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [openpgp] Clarification re subkey binding sig… Andrew Gallagher
- Re: [openpgp] Clarification re subkey binding sig… Paul Wouters