Re: [openpgp] First 4880bis drafts

Aaron Zauner <azet@azet.org> Thu, 05 November 2015 21:33 UTC

Return-Path: <azet@azet.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6ED1B2CCD for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 13:33:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XWA79GXJvIKS for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 13:33:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com (mail-wm0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31B781B2CCA for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 13:33:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wmnn186 with SMTP id n186so26023723wmn.1 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 13:33:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=azet.org; s=gmail; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=F/STpwEFQ0z8AM2wyrTN1x6GCdFw+JJDaGt7mUWDbBA=; b=PfBKQ8jewB0bCwV38a9r/ApluUfCO8CCwIAxFQDkSGxj87jcaUCL2/BTT9DD9ZH0tG 8BaTQKbqrHzghmSAijbBFFbPys66VCrFQ6Zop7dPKB1A65QiwfAvZQMJ3Th7f62xd5IG OZAGxII8SgmJjV5NuCQ6qBDT8OStBbZtkUb80=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=F/STpwEFQ0z8AM2wyrTN1x6GCdFw+JJDaGt7mUWDbBA=; b=GuHwerFeQ2yQTdDKK31Wic7gRsFLQcM5kbz9/DIpunKuIifsXSGx8JxuNSe+AJMRZ8 e+slYGUTilKkJJ0VUBMUA8CXtI0N2ACgx0KrytuOxc4aTdQkIBZIBU9tOEbVIn7WUoBn NayeVSF8qZXWXaTyh6HHvUCGP7MhYbOQEQH9/dOUSQDtPXaNOV6Ax4PGNE+COUe2Go9L DYiFAO5ndG6ki6S2fniQ6QD7urP57PkleeMt8dCHtJ5j864MOOeXog0TCvBhvryi/sVZ Fe5fq73dh+HIlaxXXKEPWOliqq29JIK7N+ygdtxSVSpARh0G3OXQ7TEVC2YY4GBzR0YV rwjA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm/15pRsTzNteOt+ALUBEg5bw3z412qO6XNSUEWrLE2urCVgCrU2x/vIqfXD5AoOG2Y+Ygy
X-Received: by 10.28.87.1 with SMTP id l1mr5947749wmb.72.1446759189816; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 13:33:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.251] ([86.59.96.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b12sm63311wma.6.2015.11.05.13.33.08 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Nov 2015 13:33:09 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <563BCB16.9010104@azet.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 22:33:10 +0100
From: Aaron Zauner <azet@azet.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.11 (Macintosh/20140602)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Robert J. Hansen" <rjh@sixdemonbag.org>
References: <87lhaet2cq.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de> <20151104182705.86af2e43c8@baae13974eb4556> <20151105013051.GD3896@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net> <563B9D9B.6020603@azet.org> <563BAE4B.901@sixdemonbag.org> <563BCAD7.3020403@azet.org>
In-Reply-To: <563BCAD7.3020403@azet.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig672CD3EF4639DC4436371F82"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/tZbJEgyT6UgMp7IQttbCgEUI3bY>
Cc: openpgp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [openpgp] First 4880bis drafts
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 21:33:12 -0000


Aaron Zauner wrote:
> I'm not saying that having alternatives to AES is a bad idea, I'm just
> saying that CAMELLIA may not be the best choice there. It has not seen a
> lot of cryptanalysis over the last couple of years (primarily because
> there's almost no interest in it).

Also - having /too many/ alternatives is certainly a bad idea.

Aaron