IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] likely timeline for WG (re)formation

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 30 October 2020 14:03 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57FC63A0EC1 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 07:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VOuVW3Unypsl for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 07:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92CA83A0EC0 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 07:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB77389BB; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:10:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id suxV8lb3nZUL; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:10:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049C1389BA; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:10:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE5D617; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:03:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
cc: "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <9d1da3a1-e67b-6c4a-deeb-979486a56f95@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <9d1da3a1-e67b-6c4a-deeb-979486a56f95@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:03:38 -0400
Message-ID: <8199.1604066618@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/tcsaKqGfQApCnZ8bX_bog-FNmNs>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] likely timeline for WG (re)formation
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 14:03:43 -0000

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
    > - given that timeline is not long (compared to the age
    > of 4880 say:-), I'd encourage people to hold fire 'till
    > that's done and we should be able to get going as an
    > "official" WG in the not-too-distant (starting in on
    > it all in detail now risks having to re-do stuff in
    > a month or so, so probably isn't worthwhile I'd say)

In the meantime, if we plan on having virtual interims (I hope so) to time
box ML discussion, then I suggest that we might want to doodle-poll,
(or that other tool you prefer) for a consistent time-of-the-week in which to
do the virtual interims.

If we are going monthly, which week.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email