[openpgp] First 4880bis drafts

Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> Wed, 04 November 2015 11:51 UTC

Return-Path: <wk@gnupg.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCBD71B2DC8 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 03:51:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rbspds5g3J9x for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 03:51:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kerckhoffs.g10code.com (kerckhoffs.g10code.com [IPv6:2001:aa8:fff1:100::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89EBA1B2BFB for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 03:51:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uucp by kerckhoffs.g10code.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) id 1Ztwb0-0001lG-Hc for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 12:51:18 +0100
Received: from wk by vigenere.g10code.de with local (Exim 4.84 #3 (Debian)) id 1ZtwVK-0000Qi-0P for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 12:45:26 +0100
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
To: openpgp@ietf.org
Organisation: g10 Code GmbH
X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text.
OpenPGP: id=F2AD85AC1E42B367; url=finger:wk@g10code.com
Mail-Followup-To: openpgp@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 12:45:25 +0100
Message-ID: <87lhaet2cq.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/uUKa8eQzWOh3quNElu0BDNrKi2o>
Subject: [openpgp] First 4880bis drafts
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 11:51:23 -0000

Hi

from your freshly appointed RFC-4880bis editor.  I talked to dkg on how
to get started and we agreed on taking my existing RFC-4880 version
which I converted to Pandoc/Markdown format some time ago.  Meanwhile I
published two I-D based on this:

  https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-koch-openpgp-rfc4880bis-00.txt

This is RFC-4880 with errata 2270, 2271, 2242, 3298 applied and some
editorial notes:

   { This is work in progress to update OpenPGP.  Editorial notes are
   enclosed in curly braces.  The section numbers from RFC4880 are also
   indicated in curly braces. }

The second I-D is:

  https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-koch-openpgp-rfc4880bis-01.txt

With these additional changes (cf. Appendix A):

   o  Added Camellia cipher from RFC 5581.

   o  Incorporated RFC 6637 (ECC for OpenPGP)

   I also fixed up a couple of formatting issues in case you wonder
   about the longer diff betwee -00 and -01.  I temporary moved the
   authors of RFC-4880 to an appendix to not annoy them with
   confirmation mails.  I don't know how this is usually handled; thus
   please drop me a note if I shall move you to the authors section now
   and not only in later I-Ds.

The diff between RFC-4880 and -00 can be viewed here:

  https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-koch-openpgp-rfc4880bis-00.txt

and the diff between -00 and -01 here:

  https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-koch-openpgp-rfc4880bis-01.txt

Please check them so we can get a stable base for our future work.


Shalom-Salam,

   Werner



p.s.
To get the source you may run

  git clone git://git.gnupg.org/people/wk/rfc4880bis.git

or follow at 

  http://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=people/wk/rfc4880bis.git

In case anyone sees a problem hosting that under a gnupg address, dkg
will probably be able to publish his repo.  In any case the plan is to
mail diffs.  The above should be considered a clone of my working copy.

To build a new draft you would run

  pandoc2rfc abstract.mkd middle.mkd back.mkd

pandoc2rfc is availabe via https://tools.ietf.org

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.