Re: [openpgp] SHA3 algorithm ids.

Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net> Sun, 09 August 2015 13:09 UTC

Return-Path: <calestyo@scientia.net>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09CBB1B2CC3 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 06:09:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.057
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.057 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12=1.543, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LB3BTdnMKdUZ for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 06:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw-01.dd24.net (mailgw-01.dd24.net [193.46.215.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 349091B2CC5 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 06:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailpolicy-01.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net (mailpolicy-01.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net [192.168.1.26]) by mailgw-01.dd24.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF995FAD9 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 13:09:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mailpolicy-01.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net
Received: from mailgw-01.dd24.net ([192.168.1.35]) by mailpolicy-01.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net (mailpolicy-01.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net [192.168.1.25]) (amavisd-new, port 10235) with ESMTP id mRyUGJ4UWRix for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 13:09:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from heisenberg.scientia.net (p5B1000BE.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.16.0.190]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgw-01.dd24.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 13:09:18 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1439090997.20521.108.camel@scientia.net>
From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>
To: IETF OpenPGP <openpgp@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwgY9S7KgwP5q2FSPrdaLpsQ1E7LOvsC5OOJTwy5ZWGODw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <835832901.20150808225230@gmail.com> <55C68729.3050603@iang.org> <1439075830.20521.66.camel@scientia.net> <CAMm+LwgY9S7KgwP5q2FSPrdaLpsQ1E7LOvsC5OOJTwy5ZWGODw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="sha-512"; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; boundary="=-QPRmndcx5j+UTa/zFMu6"
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2015 05:29:57 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.3-1
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/utYusAKTkd83FVJbs4Jz0-tGyRg>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] SHA3 algorithm ids.
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2015 13:09:24 -0000

On Sat, 2015-08-08 at 21:40 -0400, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> Why is anyone going to move from SHA-2 to SHA-3 ? Only reason I can
> think of is a real or perceived weakness in SHA-2.
Or for reasons of diversity (and the advantages thereof), which may
again make the non-512(/256) versions of SHA-3) interesting for some
people.

Cheers,
Chris.