Re: [openpgp] rechartering topics poll results...

Falko Strenzke <> Fri, 27 October 2023 06:24 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0E6C151983 for <>; Thu, 26 Oct 2023 23:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k8dpgXAKLkgm for <>; Thu, 26 Oct 2023 23:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a02:b98:8:2::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D72CAC151717 for <>; Thu, 26 Oct 2023 23:23:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (minka [IPv6:2a02:b98:8:1:0:0:0:9]) by (8.17.2/8.17.2) with ESMTPS id 39R6NrKd012874 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 08:23:54 +0200
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;; s=mail201801; t=1698387834; bh=cNW1wtg4M4bH2Qqo1HQ2v5VSywOk0WoX1g3NL0STAYE=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=nMJ7cSHVBQelF5nxL3oUNRcSdQ4DBcq0PYmvkaDP2+MMdQlCS8yM77bjbXCA0UXLv ewGHje0WQ9FFjygjzwIomKUC75IRXvE4UhPG0g5bjg3f+yBhjGA1D4ot9dKILAHBCP PM1nm3bOnvs2McKXbvI1hIavceTvk2bB4LK0vmj+/k6eoKFJPV/dp77pAZy89ERVlx bqOm6ge2KmuETxGG3cgKlR6pLybYHdPXwsNSkEfGUEZ96n+Wqthb3AnN5ofd2FRkQz q4SNfAi00ttnWflVEIUOVYwbPRN4qlgb55Ash2xumnUYZ4Hw46x88qC3PM2FBa368e zwOp/k4Cnfdtw==
Received: from [] (vpn-10-8-0-100 []) by (8.17.2/8.17.2) with ESMTPS id 39R6NqJs012493 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 08:23:53 +0200
Message-ID: <>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 08:23:51 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Stephen Farrell <>, "" <>
References: <> <>
Content-Language: en-GB
From: Falko Strenzke <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-512"; boundary="------------ms060402080304050408010505"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] rechartering topics poll results...
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 06:24:06 -0000

Hi Stephen,

I also agree with this agenda.

- Falko

Am 26.10.23 um 16:56 schrieb Stephen Farrell:
> Hiya,
> Before we try send some new charter text to the IESG for
> approval, it'd be great to get a few more positive acks
> that the plan below is ok with folks,
> Thanks,
> S.
> On 21/10/2023 13:53, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Thanks to those who took the time to take part in our poll
>> to try figure out how to prioritise the list of topics that
>> you'd like to see the WG tackle in future.
>> dkg and I had a call to discuss the results [1] of our poll
>> for initial topics, to try turn those results into milestones
>> for our updated WG charter. [2]
>> It looks to us like the poll respondents may well have picked
>> an initial 4 that might make sense for the WG so we'd like to
>> check that now. Recall that our plan is to add from the other
>> topics mentioned in the charter as milestones are completed or
>> parked, so we're not ruling things out here, we're just saying
>> which topics we'll tackle first.
>> We think our poll results could map to these initial milestones:
>> "
>>     - November 2023 - call for adoption of drafts related to
>>       post quantum cryptography to produce a proposed standard
>>       RFC
>>     - January 2024 - call for adoption of drafts related to
>>       superseded keys to produce a proposed standard RFC
>>     - January 2024 - call for adoption of drafts related to
>>       persistent symmetric keys to produce a proposed standard
>>       RFC
>>     - March 2024 - call for adoption of drafts related to
>>       WKD and/or HKP to produce a proposed standard RFC
>> "
>> The above basically stages the top 4 from the poll but
>> with a bit of a nod to recent list discussion related to
>> WKD/HKP. (On that last, if we plan a call for adoption in
>> 6 months time, we've plenty of time to think more.)
>> That looks to the chairs like it may be tractable set of
>> topics to try address in a reasonable time-frame so we'd
>> like to get your feedback on that as an outcome by the
>> 27th of October. If we think your feedback is that the
>> above has captured the rough consensus of the WG then
>> we'll add those milestones to the charter text [1] and
>> send that to our AD asking that the IESG process
>> re-chartering the WG on that basis. Positive feedback
>> that this is an ok set of initial milestones would be
>> welcome. (If the overall WG feedback goes in some other
>> direction we'll need to go into a chair-huddle again to
>> see what to try next;-)
>> Three other things to note:
>> 1) these milestones are for calls for adoption - that
>> gives people interested in these topics time to write
>> and/or polish drafts before the WG discusses adoption
>> so we do not have to only consider the current set of
>> drafts related to each topic
>> 2) in the case of PQC we can probably start discussion
>> right now, as it's very clear the WG want to do work
>> there - watch for a separate mail on the agenda for our
>> upcoming Prague meeting
>> 3) it could be that this initial set of topics might
>> lead to a situation where the overall set of editors
>> of WG documents places too much work on a set of people
>> with one sponsor, which'd be possibly unfair on those
>> people. So, as the WG adopt drafts on different topics,
>> the chairs may sometimes have to seek out new editors
>> if we run into that situation. (That's actually always
>> the official IETF process but changing editors at the
>> time of adoption doesn't happen that much, so we thought
>> it worth calling out this potential issue.)
>> Cheers,
>> dkg & Stephen.
>> [1]
>> [2] 
>> _______________________________________________
>> openpgp mailing list
> _______________________________________________
> openpgp mailing list

Dr. Falko Strenzke
Executive System Architect

Phone: +49 6151 8000 24
Web: <>


MTG AG - Dolivostr. 11 - 64293 Darmstadt, Germany
Commercial register: HRB 8901
Register Court: Amtsgericht Darmstadt
Management Board: Jürgen Ruf (CEO), Tamer Kemeröz
Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Dr. Thomas Milde

This email may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If 
you are not the correct recipient or have received this email in error,
please inform the sender immediately and delete this email. Unauthorised 
copying or distribution of this email is not permitted.

Data protection information: Privacy policy