Re: [openpgp] Deprecating compression support

Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> Fri, 22 March 2019 09:20 UTC

Return-Path: <wk@gnupg.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E0E130EC9 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 02:20:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gnupg.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ljrKtm2jhoYc for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 02:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kerckhoffs.g10code.com (kerckhoffs.g10code.com [IPv6:2001:aa8:fff1:100::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5747E130EC2 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 02:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnupg.org; s=20181017; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=RcKGptHFDRRGh9GbSZRsYfZJFIfiZJhzEWRk50p3QIY=; b=LtAtlx4WxYBNtvFyxJNRCemhVo PaoVpYNf+T8SiPc0n+3HiqCxFL0XQKtSkQDnS80f6cff7BcN6/GvhGA1UIdJfvuBJDCunoUi/FWVp +ZmFkZwUvC7wjbnNNXvCa7imn40Ulw/kw2yf383715j2rnLCUrcGGAPNRcyHyihCAfCI=;
Received: from uucp by kerckhoffs.g10code.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.89 #1 (Debian)) id 1h7GLR-0006lZ-Hl for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:20:09 +0100
Received: from wk by wheatstone.g10code.de with local (Exim 4.84 #3 (Debian)) id 1h7GKR-0004u3-T2; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:19:07 +0100
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
To: Bart Butler <bartbutler=40protonmail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Andre Heinecke <aheinecke@gnupg.org>, Bart Butler <bartbutler@protonmail.com>, "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>, Justus Winter <justuswinter@gmail.com>
References: <871s3475dy.fsf@europa.jade-hamburg.de> <2181951.mQFCbn3PMz@esus> <xEPyX3yGpisVL1Tl_L1w_HI_zAAbfs3j9Itg0iZ_GxbxtkEoB_WJWvGjbHcdfb2BJx0rnIujUqVrFbIZNhUXWAGAm79B0fwHqoOiGxSk5tk=@protonmail.com>
Organisation: GnuPG e.V.
X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text.
Mail-Followup-To: Bart Butler <bartbutler=40protonmail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Andre Heinecke <aheinecke@gnupg.org>, Bart Butler <bartbutler@protonmail.com>, "openpgp\@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>, Justus Winter <justuswinter@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:19:07 +0100
In-Reply-To: <xEPyX3yGpisVL1Tl_L1w_HI_zAAbfs3j9Itg0iZ_GxbxtkEoB_WJWvGjbHcdfb2BJx0rnIujUqVrFbIZNhUXWAGAm79B0fwHqoOiGxSk5tk=@protonmail.com> (Bart Butler's message of "Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:47:27 +0000")
Message-ID: <87va0bxo50.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=Communications_infrastructure_bce_DRA_Extreme_weather_Emergency=mana"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/vjeAVtfWy67XTEf8u8uOpNgnGck>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Deprecating compression support
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:20:15 -0000

On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:47, bartbutler=40protonmail.com@dmarc.ietf.org
said:

> One thing we could add to the compression section would be a SHOULD
> for ZLIB as opposed to the legacy ZIP and bzip2, which is slow and
> doesn't have much of a reason to exist in my opinion. There's no real

So what about this minor change:

@@ -3322,8 +3321,9 @@ ## Compression Algorithms
  100--110  Private/Experimental algorithm
 
 Implementations MUST implement uncompressed data.  Implementations
-SHOULD implement ZIP.  Implementations MAY implement any other
-algorithm.
+SHOULD implement ZLIB.  For interoperability reasons implementations
+SHOULD be able to decompress using ZIP.  Implementations MAY implement
+any other algorithm.
 
 ## Hash Algorithms



Salam-Shalom,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.