IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] [dane] The DANE draft

Vincent Breitmoser <look@my.amazin.horse> Thu, 06 August 2015 09:30 UTC

Return-Path: <look@my.amazin.horse>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8BB1B2B31; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 02:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81tcgOmxKtdr; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 02:30:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.mugenguild.com (mugenguild.com [5.135.189.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 481791B2B16; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 02:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (p5798E4D9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.152.228.217]) by mail.mugenguild.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5261C5FCD5; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 11:26:14 +0200 (CEST)
References: <CAMm+LwhYdBLXM8Td8q8SCnzgwywRgMx3wNKeS_Q0JSN4Lh7rZQ@mail.gmail.com> <87bnf1hair.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> <alpine.LFD.2.11.1507250832510.854@bofh.nohats.ca> <87bnem2xjq.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> <alpine.LFD.2.11.1508050331340.1451@bofh.nohats.ca> <55C1F35A.5070904@cs.tcd.ie> <B7419740-25C9-4F8D-85AE-FC6E11BCC038@vpnc.org> <55C22D64.9080507@strotmann.de> <alpine.LFD.2.11.1508060417450.16408@bofh.nohats.ca>
From: Vincent Breitmoser <look@my.amazin.horse>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
In-reply-to: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1508060417450.16408@bofh.nohats.ca>
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 11:30:12 +0200
Message-ID: <87egjg7oij.fsf@littlepip.fritz.box>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/wqRzXkwaBPkrFbk7fLkFThFsef8>
Cc: IETF OpenPGP <openpgp@ietf.org>, dane WG list <dane@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] [dane] The DANE draft
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 09:30:21 -0000

On 6 Aug 2015, Paul Wouters wrote:

> I might agree but I think the gain for this is so incredibly small,

The same could be said about NSEC vs NSEC3 for a motivated attacker, and
still NSEC received strong opposition.

 - V

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email