IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt

Len Sassaman <rabbi@quickie.net> Mon, 12 August 2002 18:02 UTC

Received: from above.proper.com (mail.proper.com [208.184.76.45]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA03225 for <openpgp-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 14:02:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) id g7CHtTD18364 for ietf-openpgp-bks; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 10:55:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from thetis.deor.org (thetis.deor.org [207.106.86.210]) by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g7CHtRw18360 for <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 10:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by thetis.deor.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 0FE9345022; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 10:55:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thetis.deor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0DE548023; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 10:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 10:55:27 -0700
From: Len Sassaman <rabbi@quickie.net>
X-Sender: <rabbi@thetis.deor.org>
To: OpenPGP <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>, Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt
In-Reply-To: <200208121726.g7CHQAw16824@above.proper.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.QNWS.0208121051070.25997-100000@thetis.deor.org>
X-AIM: Elom777
X-icq: 10735603
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openpgp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <ietf-openpgp.imc.org>

On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Werner Koch wrote:

> I see no more problem with the draft.  How lets try again to kick off
> the the interop tests.

I think that it would be nice to have the NAI X.509 packets documented.
Having quasi-offical data formats that implimentors need to deal with, but
are not documented, sounds like a bad idea to me. (Though, if it belongs
in a seperate Internet Draft, I have no problem with that. But there
should be some place to go other than the PGP source for this
information.)


--Len.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email