Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments
Ian G <iang@systemics.com> Tue, 19 September 2006 09:09 UTC
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GPbbM-0006Kl-0u for openpgp-archive@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2006 05:09:12 -0400
Received: from balder-227.proper.com ([192.245.12.227]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GPbbG-0001b3-Lz for openpgp-archive@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2006 05:09:12 -0400
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k8J8JPBk032662; Tue, 19 Sep 2006 01:19:25 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k8J8JPvp032661; Tue, 19 Sep 2006 01:19:25 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from mailgate.enhyper.net ([80.168.109.121]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k8J8JOho032626 for <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>; Tue, 19 Sep 2006 01:19:24 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from iang@systemics.com)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgate.enhyper.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 042E75D1D3 for <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>; Tue, 19 Sep 2006 09:19:17 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <450FA80D.4020506@systemics.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:19:25 +0200
From: Ian G <iang@systemics.com>
Organization: http://financialcryptography.com/
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060317)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf-openpgp@imc.org
Subject: Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments
References: <sjmd59txlnv.fsf@cliodev.pgp.com> <20060919023332.GA30748@jabberwocky.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060919023332.GA30748@jabberwocky.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openpgp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <ietf-openpgp.imc.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f
David Shaw wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 11:02:44AM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: > >> The second issue is the encryption with integrity packet. Today this >> is hard-wired to use SHA-1. That's not OK. We need an upgrade path >> for that and I think we need to support SHA-256 now. > > Does the MDC actually need collision resistance? I was under the > impression that (like the secret key "S2K 254" use of SHA-1) this was > essentially a checksum and the recent attacks against SHA-1 did not > apply. Yes, that was my question too. iang
- [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments Derek Atkins
- Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments "Hal Finney"
- Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments Jon Callas
- Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments David Shaw
- Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments Ian G
- Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments Werner Koch
- Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments Ian G
- Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments David Shaw
- Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments Werner Koch
- Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments David Shaw
- Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments Ian G
- Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments Jon Callas
- Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments Daniel A. Nagy
- Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments David Shaw
- Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments Daniel A. Nagy
- RE: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments Anton Stiglic
- Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments Werner Koch
- Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments Lutz Donnerhacke
- Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments Marko Kreen