IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] [dane] The DANE draft

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Thu, 06 August 2015 10:43 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9DA1B2C51; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 03:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U52vGmA_TY2Y; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 03:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF2861B2C6E; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 03:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3mn5yc1SSRz3Nm; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:43:36 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: mx.nohats.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca header.i=@nohats.ca header.b=VWpcEazm
X-OPENPGPKEY: Message passed unmodified
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SeO7lRpMH3aQ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:43:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (206-248-139-105.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.139.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:43:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBDC80042; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 06:43:32 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1438857812; bh=mMNeIkMKtZqwJnAqKCRQPiaFUKiBDHZN2JGsoRmRQGs=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=VWpcEazmU4VJPfrH+ln5nLF/OclbYmp0sL36iblYfJ5gyWg5aKeTUB2+O8krg/wxJ tHlhBGhKh6hZ6F9xSi3Chb3JMwwog8Y8vcWArmcxjyO4Op3rkoezWPBqzgKBb40J1C en3nfu5vHHTOz6ZfEWtTIJQxuiW6+oJgyVSufgm8=
Received: from localhost (paul@localhost) by bofh.nohats.ca (8.15.1/8.15.1/Submit) with ESMTP id t76AhVOM017440; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 06:43:32 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: bofh.nohats.ca: paul owned process doing -bs
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 06:43:31 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Vincent Breitmoser <look@my.amazin.horse>
In-Reply-To: <87egjg7oij.fsf@littlepip.fritz.box>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1508060641200.16977@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <CAMm+LwhYdBLXM8Td8q8SCnzgwywRgMx3wNKeS_Q0JSN4Lh7rZQ@mail.gmail.com> <87bnf1hair.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> <alpine.LFD.2.11.1507250832510.854@bofh.nohats.ca> <87bnem2xjq.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> <alpine.LFD.2.11.1508050331340.1451@bofh.nohats.ca> <55C1F35A.5070904@cs.tcd.ie> <B7419740-25C9-4F8D-85AE-FC6E11BCC038@vpnc.org> <55C22D64.9080507@strotmann.de> <alpine.LFD.2.11.1508060417450.16408@bofh.nohats.ca> <87egjg7oij.fsf@littlepip.fritz.box>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (LFD 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/zQEgKkp4B-ubiRnDHoEEXxtXTkU>
Cc: IETF OpenPGP <openpgp@ietf.org>, dane WG list <dane@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] [dane] The DANE draft
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 10:43:45 -0000

On Thu, 6 Aug 2015, Vincent Breitmoser wrote:

>> I might agree but I think the gain for this is so incredibly small,
>
> The same could be said about NSEC vs NSEC3 for a motivated attacker, and
> still NSEC received strong opposition.

Actually, most users of NSEC3 care more about the OPT-OUT feature than
the hashing feature. And there is no OPT-OUT with NSEC.

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email