IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] v5 sample key

Daniel Huigens <d.huigens@protonmail.com> Fri, 07 June 2019 16:59 UTC

Return-Path: <d.huigens@protonmail.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92AFF12011C for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 09:59:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D0xTxfCPJIDs for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 09:59:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-40132.protonmail.ch (mail-40132.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEDA11200DB for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 09:59:22 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 16:59:15 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=default; t=1559926760; bh=xDelo/j0XSNgm+WajEBHcQUJTXD1FbpQ6tIMUkoMWrA=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From; b=ayPpCFGAXf3GF8Zu526gwyN0SRaZN7rA3J4Bm1Q0sSYzWUJf10FRAFI6NVckjj/BW WVchWfZZj1793sqZQipZab8MAt1ms/34oiyVcNuw1eBys745idbE/BduJm3rofXdC7 pNutjUbNBIAJ/NgLBLC6LdtHGextSO2/I7DpwDVo=
To: Heiko Stamer <HeikoStamer@gmx.net>
From: Daniel Huigens <d.huigens@protonmail.com>
Cc: "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
Reply-To: Daniel Huigens <d.huigens@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <PicAupj9q8WrMF6gkiSXUYbW2DohEO54GZHDnSwuiFmxwBk_atSRn56VjSUY7-1BQxcV9BDZgfmoKn--bgn15FJgN_KjbfP9LnmZSfLUVi8=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <02d3c87e-f280-ff7f-5bee-d43c7b763546@gmx.net>
References: <87sgvh1ugy.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> <aef8c02b-b672-83ce-57d3-1203179cc209@gmx.net> <871s1tyvkl.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> <02d3c87e-f280-ff7f-5bee-d43c7b763546@gmx.net>
Feedback-ID: 2O-EbwvyAhS-6lLY8Plw88haDPLqZjDpASBCZJZlvdyh2nVaeeg1pCY1IfQd3olovlIUpCF_XMKGhUP1haiY2Q==:Ext:ProtonMail
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/zY8062JSDzImCB7SkHYHB2Arbtc>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] v5 sample key
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 16:59:28 -0000

On 30 April 2019 23:28, Heiko Stamer <HeikoStamer@gmx.net> wrote:

> I've attached a detached v5 signature of this key for testing purposes.

It seems this signature didn't hash the 6 zero bytes from the new fields described at https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc4880bis-07#page-44, right?

(I'm trying to implement V5 signatures in OpenPGP.js.)

Best,
Daniel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email