Re: [openpgp] Web Key Directory I-D -07

Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> Thu, 15 November 2018 11:25 UTC

Return-Path: <wk@gnupg.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFAA126CC7 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 03:25:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gnupg.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sBNr2AIQjnXE for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 03:25:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kerckhoffs.g10code.com (kerckhoffs.g10code.com [IPv6:2001:aa8:fff1:100::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 701E7124C04 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 03:25:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnupg.org; s=20181017; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=vrgSw7jSKGs2C9cwi1kd3rmn5bFZqOpljBE6oyG0OKU=; b=OwTorErWA9OkTuMILJCOx7yRGt 9+OjgBVsoQCHy8UnIsVgka7uxQKc7P3znXUaKVEDDUzfXSjmpAj+vab09hrScenJTixPJ19/fxD2I Cwk0/dC8AqrvxWvJYFcl6e3Y59CtH4w1CTHTWLr7RkbWM8ktFuO7hu2EDfC4J+gDY2vQ=;
Received: from uucp by kerckhoffs.g10code.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.89 #1 (Debian)) id 1gNFlk-0000B0-VC for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 12:25:08 +0100
Received: from wk by wheatstone.g10code.de with local (Exim 4.84 #3 (Debian)) id 1gNFjO-0002oc-Jp; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 12:22:42 +0100
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
To: azul <azul@riseup.net>
Cc: openpgp@ietf.org
References: <878t1xoz37.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> <9J2v287mmh9FWFLrXjxZGnVjA8HNCHpPc2wyEDDqhGeKAhE7grR6JKFMRoHJfKSq9qcjDGRNfoJ5sEODERtP0Q==@protonmail.com> <875zx0n0j9.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> <lVvFGxVUkBNCpL2ek6IOg0IR5V0Y94sscgd72rcoZ_obkE-9WZ6L-wz9BXlxclZ8dXoc9dCMLndA8-LVMG5vcA==@protonmail.com> <87sh04km1x.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> <0a788c9c-cd3f-76df-4f65-754b0e08eb24@riseup.net>
Organisation: GnuPG e.V.
X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text.
Mail-Followup-To: azul <azul@riseup.net>, openpgp@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 12:22:42 +0100
In-Reply-To: <0a788c9c-cd3f-76df-4f65-754b0e08eb24@riseup.net> (azul@riseup.net's message of "Thu, 15 Nov 2018 10:13:21 +0100")
Message-ID: <8736s2inzx.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=STARLAN_Europol_warfare_ASIO_Craig_Livingstone_Skipjack_cracking_wir"; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/zm5KTGgir7ZEoOQkVYahAAhos9k>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Web Key Directory I-D -07
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 11:25:13 -0000

On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 10:13, azul@riseup.net said:

> One example would be using 'azul+conference_name@riseup.net'; to register
> to a conference.
> It's low overhead. I can just come up with a addition to my email

Right, and we more or less agreed that this is a good and useful
extension.  I merely don't think that it should go into the protocol,
because it is a MUA thing.  GnuPG will very likely help MUAs by taking
care to strip of such sub-addresses when looking for keys in a remote
directory [1].


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner



[1] See
<https://dev.gnupg.org/rG6b9f772914624cc673ba26d49b6e3adc32dd7e0a>
for a start


-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.