IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Openv6] [Aeon] Next step, IETF 90?

Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> Wed, 02 July 2014 17:32 UTC

Return-Path: <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Original-To: openv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C221B29B5; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 10:32:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id chIZ_X9mYZMp; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 10:32:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out4.uio.no (mail-out4.uio.no [IPv6:2001:700:100:10::15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 692741B2974; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 10:32:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-mx3.uio.no ([129.240.10.44]) by mail-out4.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1X2OOR-0003vG-Qs; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 19:32:27 +0200
Received: from 089144238043.atnat0047.highway.bob.at ([89.144.238.43] helo=[192.168.0.100]) by mail-mx3.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) user michawe (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1X2OOR-0007kL-0H; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 19:32:27 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A021CED8-8BA3-4D85-AAFF-AAFD73F9587C"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\))
From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <CAKEbE1ZXgxd+ANkrjFeEi5pYTOMcf-tVHmNuKBSK65pzRi=3Kg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 19:32:13 +0200
Message-Id: <27559799-1645-45F0-A089-BB1AF65B5063@ifi.uio.no>
References: <EA4C43BE752A194597B002779DF69BAE23B3DD5C@ESESSMB303.ericsson.se> <00bb01cf95f7$e9ef2b60$bdcd8220$@chinamobile.com> <33687996-B978-4CC8-891C-0917907EC089@huawei.com> <CAKEbE1ZXgxd+ANkrjFeEi5pYTOMcf-tVHmNuKBSK65pzRi=3Kg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Reinaldo Penno <rapenno@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2)
X-UiO-SPF-Received:
X-UiO-Ratelimit-Test: rcpts/h 6 msgs/h 1 sum rcpts/h 7 sum msgs/h 2 total rcpts 18096 max rcpts/h 44 ratelimit 0
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO)
X-UiO-Scanned: B3A3B21C87B2BC82FD458E2E48B69E089062C769
X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 89.144.238.43 spam_score: -49 maxlevel 80 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 1 total 16 max/h 6 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openv6/3cUzCZyVciAzi9zfUMCp0hXeqjs
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 18:09:24 -0700
Cc: Szilveszter Nadas <Szilveszter.Nadas@ericsson.com>, "aeon@ietf.org" <aeon@ietf.org>, "Openv6@ietf.org" <Openv6@ietf.org>, "Fan, Peng" <fanpeng@chinamobile.com>, Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Openv6] [Aeon] Next step, IETF 90?
X-BeenThere: openv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Openv6 discussion list <openv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openv6>, <mailto:openv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/openv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:openv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openv6>, <mailto:openv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 17:32:36 -0000

> I believe the more fragmented these initiatives are, more confusion to IESG. The paragraphs above would be enough confusion to anyone. 
> 
> 

+1. There should be one clear vision that is shared by a large group of people.

Cheers,
Michael

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email