[Openv6] 答复: Another question: the name of the functionalities

Felix <felix.lu@huawei.com> Mon, 09 June 2014 16:39 UTC

Return-Path: <felix.lu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: openv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33DEE1A0096 for <openv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 09:39:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.099
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N_ihVjMzQ_mP for <openv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 09:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5450A1A00D4 for <Openv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 09:39:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BFF82098; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 16:39:12 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEMA405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.37) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 17:39:09 +0100
Received: from SZXEMA510-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.46]) by SZXEMA405-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.37]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:39:04 +0800
From: Felix <felix.lu@huawei.com>
To: Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>, "Openv6@ietf.org" <Openv6@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Openv6] Another question: the name of the functionalities
Thread-Index: Ac+D9zs26jdZB9oZSHK+gQOstbPTzAACckcZ
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 16:39:04 +0000
Message-ID: <4B29BA0800EE424E850D442A1A3D180340718BEA@SZXEMA510-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <00c901cf83f7$eb70c230$c2524690$@unizar.es>
In-Reply-To: <00c901cf83f7$eb70c230$c2524690$@unizar.es>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.46.37.99]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4B29BA0800EE424E850D442A1A3D180340718BEASZXEMA510MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openv6/5ng4tMqV0teQqrVg7-l_ZIiI7hk
Subject: [Openv6] 答复: Another question: the name of the functionalities
X-BeenThere: openv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Openv6 discussion list <openv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openv6>, <mailto:openv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/openv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:openv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openv6>, <mailto:openv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 16:39:17 -0000

Hi all,



I prefer "Network capabilities" for grouping these actions.



Best regards!

Felix





________________________________
发件人: Openv6 [openv6-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Jose Saldana [jsaldana@unizar.es]
发送时间: 2014年6月9日 23:31
收件人: Openv6@ietf.org
主题: [Openv6] Another question: the name of the functionalities

Hi,

Another question is how to name the set of functionalities you are considering in APONF:

- In the first paragraph, they are called “traffic capabilities”: “ the communication network to apply the following different network management and/or traffic capabilities”

- Later, they are called “traffic policies”: “Examples of such network management and traffic policies that are considered by APONF are the following”


I think that finding a good name grouping these actions is crucial:

Manage dynamically network semantics
Orchestrate dynamically virtualized functions
Permit or Block or Redirect the traffic
Log the traffic
Copy the traffic
Set the traffic
Mark the traffic

Are they traffic policies? Network actions? Network functionalities? Network capabilities? Traffic capabilities? Network management actions?


What do you think?

Jose Saldana