Re: [Openv6] 答复: Another question: the name of the functionalities

[<[e-mail]>]

Hi Hosnieh,



Thank you very much!
We will consider it for the next version of the problem statement draft!



Best regards,

Georgiois



________________________________
Van: Hosnieh Rafiee [[e-mail]]
Verzonden: dinsdag 10 juni 2014 17:25
Aan: Karagiannis, G. (EWI); [e-mail]
Onderwerp: RE: [Openv6] 答复: Another question: the name of the functionalities

Hi Georgios,

  GiLan is another important application of network function virtualization. In mobile core networks, it is preferable that QoS provisioning and network function requirements are different for subscribers with different profiles. In such scenarios, specialized applications such as BSS/OSS can  send service policies to a policy decision point, which further map these service policies to GiLan specific VNF policies, and realize the required QoS and with appropriate network functions, for example, video transcoding parameters, traffic steering points, etc.

Best,
Hosnieh



From: Openv6 [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of [e-mail]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 8:47 AM
To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [Openv6] 答复: Another question: the name of the functionalities


Hi Hosnieh,



Thank you very much!

Can you please provide text?



Best regards,

Georgios



________________________________
Van: Openv6 [[e-mail]] namens Hosnieh Rafiee [[e-mail]]
Verzonden: dinsdag 10 juni 2014 8:43
Aan: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Onderwerp: Re: [Openv6] 答复: Another question: the name of the functionalities
Hi all,
   GiLan is another important application of network function virtualization. You may consider to add this into your PS draft.
Best,
Hosnieh

From: Openv6 [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Liushucheng (Will)
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 8:35 AM
To: Felix; Jose Saldana; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [Openv6] 答复: Another question: the name of the functionalities

+1
IMHO, this one is appropriate.

Regards,
Will (Shucheng LIU)

From: Openv6 [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Felix
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 12:39 AM
To: Jose Saldana; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Subject: [Openv6] 答复: Another question: the name of the functionalities


Hi all,



I prefer "Network capabilities" for grouping these actions.



Best regards!

Felix





________________________________
发件人: Openv6 [[e-mail]] 代表 Jose Saldana [[e-mail]]
发送时间: 2014年6月9日 23:31
收件人: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
主题: [Openv6] Another question: the name of the functionalities
Hi,

Another question is how to name the set of functionalities you are considering in APONF:

- In the first paragraph, they are called “traffic capabilities”: “ the communication network to apply the following different network management and/or traffic capabilities”

- Later, they are called “traffic policies”: “Examples of such network management and traffic policies that are considered by APONF are the following”


I think that finding a good name grouping these actions is crucial:

Manage dynamically network semantics
Orchestrate dynamically virtualized functions
Permit or Block or Redirect the traffic
Log the traffic
Copy the traffic
Set the traffic
Mark the traffic

Are they traffic policies? Network actions? Network functionalities? Network capabilities? Traffic capabilities? Network management actions?


What do you think?

Jose Saldana