Re: [Openv6] new APONF goals based on APONF bar BOF meeting

"Jun Bi" <junbi@tsinghua.edu.cn> Thu, 24 July 2014 23:28 UTC

Return-Path: <junbi@tsinghua.edu.cn>
X-Original-To: openv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B87611A0A9F for <openv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 16:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OmmwRAp1HOhP for <openv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 16:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tsinghua.edu.cn (smtp04.tsinghua.edu.cn [166.111.204.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96951A0AA5 for <openv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 16:28:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from junbithinkpadx1 (unknown [31.133.165.28]) by app2 (Coremail) with SMTP id C8xvpgBnbx+iltFT68uCAA--.15807S2; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 07:28:37 +0800 (CST)
From: "Jun Bi" <junbi@tsinghua.edu.cn>
To: <openv6@ietf.org>
References: <FF1A9612A94D5C4A81ED7DE1039AB80F5D57BA9B@EXMBX24.ad.utwente.nl> <53CEE501.8020907@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 19:28:32 -0400
Message-ID: <010b01cfa796$fe011310$fa033930$@tsinghua.edu.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AQGAj+dtDMhzBk/dlSnVNiZwte13bgJjgIjTnDpnXMCAAInB4IAAAMgg
Content-Language: zh-cn
X-CM-TRANSID: C8xvpgBnbx+iltFT68uCAA--.15807S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxGF17tFyxCFWkuFW5KF4Durg_yoW5Kw4xpF WrAFn7Ca9rGr10kw4kX3WF9w15uFs3G3y5JwnxXw4DA3s8GFy8Kry3tw1YvrZ8GryfXr18 Zay29Fy5uw1rZ37anT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUU7Gb7Iv0xC_Cr1lb4IE77IF4wAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8I cIk0rVWrJVCq3wA2ocxC64kIII0Yj41le2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wAqx4xG64 xvF2IEw4CE5I8CrVC2j2WlYx0E74AGY7Cv6cx26w4UJr1UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8 JwACjcxG0xvY0x0EwIxGrwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCF04k20xvE74AGY7Cv6cx26w4UJr 1UMI8I3I0E5I8CrVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lx2IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE17CEb7AF 67AKxVWUJVWUXwCIc40Y0x0EwIxGrbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvj7UU6E8UUUUU
X-CM-SenderInfo: xmxquxo6wvx0pjkxthxhgxhubq/
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openv6/U4h7egqb5O5TXIur4BImn0OWcmQ
Subject: Re: [Openv6] new APONF goals based on APONF bar BOF meeting
X-BeenThere: openv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Openv6 discussion list <openv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openv6>, <mailto:openv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/openv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:openv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openv6>, <mailto:openv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 23:28:41 -0000

BTW, shall we change the name of mailing-list to aponf@ietf.org ?

Thanks,
Jun

-----Original Message-----
From: Jun Bi [mailto:junbi@tsinghua.edu.cn] 
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 7:27 PM
To: 'openv6@ietf.org'
Subject: RE: [Openv6] new APONF goals based on APONF bar BOF meeting

One example to use APONF for SAVI (source address validation improvements).

Thanks!

Jun

-----Original Message-----
From: Jun Bi [mailto:junbi@tsinghua.edu.cn]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 11:23 AM
To: 'Tom Taylor'; 'karagian@cs.utwente.nl'.nl'; 'openv6@ietf.org'
Subject: RE: [Openv6] new APONF goals based on APONF bar BOF meeting

I have a suggestion to change the terminology.

For figure 1 on page 4, the "end user application" is not a good term.

I noticed that the figure in the latest PPT from Georgios and Tina, " end
user application" was changed to "network service". I think it is good.

So one page 5 of APONF problem statement draft:

"Network Management Application: Operational Support System (OSS) like
applications that help a communication service provider to monitor, control,
analyze and manage a communication network."

Could we change " Network Management Application" to "Network Service", to
be consist with the latest figure ?


In addition, may I propose we also change "Network Management Application
System" to "Network Service System" ? 

Change the definition "Network management application systems: Systems or
platforms that run the network management application."
To
"Network Service Systems: Systems or platforms that run the network
service."

Best Regards,
Jun Bi



-----Original Message-----
From: openv6-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:openv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Tom Taylor
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 6:26 PM
To: karagian@cs.utwente.nl; openv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Openv6] new APONF goals based on APONF bar BOF meeting

Follow-up below, expressing my understanding of further details agreed last
night.


On 14-07-22 05:13 PM, karagian@cs.utwente.nl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> To be informed!
>
> Please note that this version is modified based on the comments that 
> we received yesterday during the bar BOF meeting.
>
...

Procedurally: when a new service is defined, the Network Management (NM)
Application function downloads an initial network service graph to the NM
Control function. The data includes triggers for NM Control to feed back
updates to the graph. When one of these triggers is engaged, NM Control
sends back a refreshed network service graph.

Discussion Point 1: I am trying to relate this to SFC as a service. The
starting point is the Service Function Chain. This has to be translated into
one or more instances of a Service Function Path, which get passed to the
Service Classifier. Path derivation is logically something NM Control would
be responsible for. Which APONF function would be responsible for
distributing the path information to the Classifier(s)?

Discussion Point 2: to do its mapping between information gathered from
Network Elements (NE) and the network service graphs, NM Control needs a
database associating NE-provided attributes with service-specific labels.
Would downloading of such a dictionary be part of APONF responsibilities, or
would we leave creation of the database to be an operator-specific matter?

I stand to be corrected on my basic understanding of APONF operation, and
welcome comments on the discussion points.

Tom Taylor

_______________________________________________
Openv6 mailing list
Openv6@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openv6