Re: [Openv6] 答复: Another question: the name of the functionalities

["Hosnieh Rafiee" <[e-mail]>]

Hi all,

   GiLan is another important application of network function
virtualization. You may consider to add this into your PS draft.

Best,

Hosnieh

 

From: Openv6 [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Liushucheng
(Will)
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 8:35 AM
To: Felix; Jose Saldana; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [Openv6] 答复: Another question: the name of the
functionalities

 

+1

IMHO, this one is appropriate.

 

Regards,

Will (Shucheng LIU)

 

From: Openv6 [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Felix
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 12:39 AM
To: Jose Saldana; [e-mail]
Subject: [Openv6] 答复: Another question: the name of the functionalities

 

Hi all,

 

I prefer "Network capabilities" for grouping these actions.

 

Best regards!

Felix

 

 

  _____  

发件人: Openv6 [[e-mail]] 代表 Jose Saldana [jsaldana@unizar.
es]
发送时间: 2014年6月9日 23:31
收件人: [e-mail]
主题: [Openv6] Another question: the name of the functionalities

Hi,

 

Another question is how to name the set of functionalities you are
considering in APONF:

 

- In the first paragraph, they are called “traffic capabilities”: “ the
communication network to apply the following different network management
and/or traffic capabilities”

 

- Later, they are called “traffic policies”: “Examples of such network
management and traffic policies that are considered by APONF are the
following”

 

 

I think that finding a good name grouping these actions is crucial:

 

Manage dynamically network semantics

Orchestrate dynamically virtualized functions 

Permit or Block or Redirect the traffic

Log the traffic 

Copy the traffic 

Set the traffic 

Mark the traffic

 

Are they traffic policies? Network actions? Network functionalities? Network
capabilities? Traffic capabilities? Network management actions?

 

 

What do you think?

 

Jose Saldana