[Openv6] APONF bar BOF agenda proposal

<karagian@cs.utwente.nl> Tue, 24 June 2014 05:51 UTC

Return-Path: <karagian@cs.utwente.nl>
X-Original-To: openv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C38A1B2847 for <openv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 22:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nRw22p2RT37c for <openv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 22:51:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out42-ams.mf.surf.net (out42-ams.mf.surf.net [145.0.1.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2144A1B283A for <openv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 22:51:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXEDGE02.ad.utwente.nl (exedge02.ad.utwente.nl [130.89.5.49]) by outgoing2-ams.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id s5O5pb9o006257 for <openv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 07:51:37 +0200
Received: from EXHUB01.ad.utwente.nl (130.89.4.228) by EXEDGE02.ad.utwente.nl (130.89.5.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.181.6; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 07:51:38 +0200
Received: from EXMBX23.ad.utwente.nl ([169.254.3.31]) by EXHUB01.ad.utwente.nl ([130.89.4.228]) with mapi id 14.03.0181.006; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 07:51:36 +0200
From: <karagian@cs.utwente.nl>
To: <openv6@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: APONF bar BOF agenda proposal
Thread-Index: AQHPj3BbVcfOAJel3UyTOvCXbiV1gA==
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 05:51:35 +0000
Message-ID: <FF1A9612A94D5C4A81ED7DE1039AB80F4F4941DF@EXMBX23.ad.utwente.nl>
Accept-Language: nl-NL, en-US
Content-Language: nl-NL
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [95.224.118.204]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_FF1A9612A94D5C4A81ED7DE1039AB80F4F4941DFEXMBX23adutwent_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: utwente-out:default, base:default, @@RPTN)
X-CanIt-Geo: ip=130.89.5.49; country=NL; region=Provincie Overijssel; city=Enschede; latitude=52.2195; longitude=6.8912; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=52.2195,6.8912&z=6
X-CanItPRO-Stream: utwente-out:default (inherits from utwente:default, base:default)
X-Canit-Stats-ID: 0vMi5PBcq - 02d1e46bf828 - 20140624 (trained as not-spam)
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openv6/yv6bAvSCm4B3MvfizmJC3ufht80
Subject: [Openv6] APONF bar BOF agenda proposal
X-BeenThere: openv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Openv6 discussion list <openv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openv6>, <mailto:openv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/openv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:openv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openv6>, <mailto:openv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 05:51:43 -0000

Dear all,



Below you can find a proposal for the APONF bar BOF agenda.



Please note that we have not yet chosen a a suitable day and time for the APONF bar BOF.



The reason for this is that the APONF doodle poll has not yet closed!



The closing date is the 1st of July!



If you have not yet filled in the doodle poll, can you please fill in your availability time, following the below URL?



http://doodle.com/hbtkqvirfyqqteiz



If you have any comments, or if you would like to add more agenda points to the agenda, please let us know!



Proposed agenda items APONF bar BOF

==========================



o) briefly present APONF use cases,

o) problem statement



o) what is in the scope and what is out of the scope of APONF

o) what are the relations with other IETF WGs and available BOF descriptions



o) what are the expected deliverables

o) what are the next steps



Best regards,

Scott Bradner and Georgios Karagiannis