[OPS-NM] Re: [nmrg] Re: [OPS-AREA] Question about draft-xu-cops-push-00.txt

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de> Thu, 15 March 2007 12:43 UTC

Return-path: <ops-nm-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HRpIR-0007aW-Br; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 08:43:07 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HRkKQ-0003MC-9z; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 03:24:50 -0400
Received: from hermes.iu-bremen.de ([212.201.44.23]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HRkKP-0002Cd-0D; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 03:24:50 -0400
Received: from localhost (demetrius.iu-bremen.de [212.201.44.32]) by hermes.iu-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D84F6DDAE; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 08:24:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from hermes.iu-bremen.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius.iu-bremen.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31664-06; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 08:24:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from elstar.iuhb02.iu-bremen.de (elstar.iuhb02.iu-bremen.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.iu-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758526DD9E; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 08:24:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: by elstar.iuhb02.iu-bremen.de (Postfix, from userid 501) id 6CFF61DC06D; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 08:24:41 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 08:24:41 +0100
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>
To: Tom-PT Taylor <taylor@nortel.com>
Message-ID: <20070315072441.GC15768@elstar.iuhb02.iu-bremen.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Tom-PT Taylor <taylor@nortel.com>, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, Heyuan Xu <xuheyuan@mail.ritt.com.cn>, ops-nm@ietf.org, dongsun@alcatel-lucent.com, Hexian Huang <huanghexian@mail.ritt.com.cn>, nmrg@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de, ops-area@ietf.org, Tina Tsou <tena@huawei.com>
References: <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F0C7A797F@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com> <45F70371.4010500@nortel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <45F70371.4010500@nortel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.3.3 (20050822) at iu-bremen.de
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 08:43:05 -0400
Cc: Heyuan Xu <xuheyuan@mail.ritt.com.cn>, ops-nm@ietf.org, dongsun@alcatel-lucent.com, Tina Tsou <tena@huawei.com>, Hexian Huang <huanghexian@mail.ritt.com.cn>, nmrg@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de, ops-area@ietf.org
Subject: [OPS-NM] Re: [nmrg] Re: [OPS-AREA] Question about draft-xu-cops-push-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ops-nm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de
List-Id: OPS Area NM e-mail list <ops-nm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-nm>, <mailto:ops-nm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ops-nm>
List-Post: <mailto:ops-nm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ops-nm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-nm>, <mailto:ops-nm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ops-nm-bounces@ietf.org

On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 04:02:57PM -0400, Tom-PT Taylor wrote:
 
> My co-authors can better explain the choice of COPS.

So can one of your co-authors please speak up and address Dan's
question in technical terms?

In particular, I like to know what you consider the essential
technical features making COPS-PR more desirable than other protocols
to push configuration information (like NETCONF) that seem to have
gained more community support during the last few years (at least in
the IETF).

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		 Jacobs University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	 P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany

_______________________________________________
OPS-NM mailing list
OPS-NM@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-nm