[opsarea-chairs] FW: Help........
"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Thu, 18 August 2011 15:34 UTC
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF4021F8BCB for <email@example.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.434 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.165, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([220.127.116.11]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mGffdN31B9Y6 for <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [18.104.22.168]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31EE321F8BF9 for <email@example.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,245,1312171200"; d="scan'208";a="262972097"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([22.214.171.124]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 18 Aug 2011 11:35:21 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([126.96.36.199]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 18 Aug 2011 11:31:41 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:35:19 +0200
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: [opsarea-chairs] FW: Help........
List-Id: Archived discussions of OPS Area WG Chairs and ADs <opsarea-chairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsarea-chairs>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsarea-chairs>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:34:29 -0000
email@example.com, please! -----Original Message----- From: Fred Baker [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 6:33 PM To: Tim Chown Cc: email@example.com Subject: Re: Help........ On Aug 17, 2011, at 6:46 AM, Tim Chown wrote: > I thought the submission tool now refused to post if there were nits reported? That would be nice if true. That said, if a draft is posted in June and I send it to Ron in September, its references may have been updated in the meantime if nothing else. > At least, I recall having this happen to me before the Quebec deadline. > > Tim > > On 13 Aug 2011, at 03:49, Joel Jaeggli wrote: > >> if the nit checker produces anything other than warnings it should be summarily rejected unless it arrives with an explination of why it doesn't pass the nit checker. >> >> e.g. that's evidence of a lack of even rudimentary supervision. >> >> joel >> >> On Aug 12, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Ronald Bonica wrote: >> >>> Folks, >>> >>> Most of you already do these things, so please don't be offended by the following reminder. >>> >>> Before a WG chair sends a document to the IESG for publication, the chair should: >>> >>> - Make sure that at least a few experts have carefully reviewed the draft >>> - Read the draft >>> - If the chair's evaluation of the draft is different than the experts', resolve the difference >>> - Run the ID nit checker (http://tools.ietf.org/tools/idnits/) >>> - If any problems are found, ask the author fix them >>> >>> Lately, a few drafts with glaring errors have reached the IESG. We can prevent this with a little up-front effort. >>> >>> Ron >>> >>> >> >