Re: [OPSAWG] Minutes of L3NM/L2NM module discussions

"Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com> Thu, 21 May 2020 14:43 UTC

Return-Path: <jclarke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B913A0D0F for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2020 07:43:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=T51no+55; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=kyT0FixJ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z1MrlGC9Khre for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2020 07:43:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACB9A3A0D1A for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 May 2020 07:43:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7108; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1590072229; x=1591281829; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=4Z5KWI6ymBiM5myowlScR2NclMtjDbMWuCaGqW9tY0k=; b=T51no+55pjebQoD2G1+O8+bFn5M5qfWNHiJp9U7NFwwve8Oyy2Ec9g5u zMSJ/E4l8N1FxMv5kBpkEyAbEbg8y3rbjhZL7avb2YrYvibrfi36jIa3t kkPI05oFqvwKZMp88cWEmkbDqRdNEVzLySydpG08hze83y/yEF8/9Tmw4 Q=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:7w+LtBGHDMcD5IopenhgRp1GYnJ96bzpIg4Y7IYmgLtSc6Oluo7vJ1Hb+e401gObQYjf5vxDjevduubrXmlTqZqCsXVXdptKWldFjMgNhAUvDYaDDlGzN//laSE2XaEgHF9o9n22Kw5ZTcD5YVCBvnC24DAVHBT0PEx+IeGmUoLXht68gua1/ZCbag5UhT27NLV1Khj+rQjYusQMx4V4LaNkwRrSqXwOcONTlm4=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CVCAApksZe/5tdJa1lHgEBCxIMQIE8C4ElL1EHb1gvLIdqA6EUhGaCUgNVCwEBAQwBASMKAgQBAYREAoIRJDcGDgIDAQELAQEFAQEBAgEFBG2FVgyFcgIBAxIuAQE3AQ8CAQhGMiUBAQQOJ4MEAYF+TQMuAQ6nKQKBOYhhdIE0gwEBAQWBMgGBFoJpGIIOAwaBOIJjiV8agUE/gTgcgk0+gmcCghKDGoItjjUpiSqBLplvCoJTiCmQKR2ddZo2kCeDSAIEAgQFAg4BAQWBaCOBVnAVZQGCPj4SGA2JLocSDBeDT4pWdDcCBggBAQMJfIw5AQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,418,1583193600"; d="scan'208,217";a="680996162"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 21 May 2020 14:43:48 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 04LEhluN013240 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 21 May 2020 14:43:48 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 21 May 2020 09:43:47 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 21 May 2020 09:43:46 -0500
Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 21 May 2020 10:43:46 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=jV4JbbOjbH4s9tFmG8y1EgEU6s6qs0OZ+Uv7kFY9d+OkCWVzehkvbRFqlL4gcaqTfnwzqWjsDEsBRHCQfWiBQLGWdRIUdQBNnYOg/v2Kd32pMiY/ZMS4PWWYj0HYqjeC5d8ZpmdV+TjHxZGtBIolJwu2rEhJuD1BaGA1heI6IBPZ6N+0M7xkA71dOgiHwHmyxMpuKl8x3S5vfYjerF1yrI3n1T/34ta6IXaB6zU1gW7sbywC9Jr4LItDsHlo305D7MWZpxDhBtF1rCXtz2TfxrsVBij12RA59rzGVKF1/bU7mOi3V7wKj9CbtrN1MHBMrkfQC5baLwLxG9rG++VmWQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=dp0hVZOQbNSyBYO3r9YqnylJ++OBM2c2ak3HMk0hCO0=; b=i5lcE1o8oZrA1brJe3DkZ7jDw/p+AtVcSms06yzL0I8WJOdxCq710BspaC7APQlOOqV0uSte/5MRAdsOhsx9wkIBQ8tvL5Ol7sdu8AJ+gOnPzmr4zNAeHkss1Q+TQiJFAxwePYi7LXMrOv2MS/uX4mo4PHxZiG/rI9eECkSknowie8vQqHZjL0Q73DXIX5Qv2AmH4IHYAEnUP6/tjgs2RCn5JZMQkhjR2NdFAEMx+7KWQWdLB14CP0WwvA+H3EjG7UrwJqlllqF567ueHYsMuoasO6Mty2WBDX25vhz0ADfZysXUrg97P1XLyCLhSrjveo33JJ9C0RwizQcXU+yfAA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=dp0hVZOQbNSyBYO3r9YqnylJ++OBM2c2ak3HMk0hCO0=; b=kyT0FixJMfJUzJ0E5UqLN1khN8m2PRai3gsJ9trGy4DXMkCHFbI7UdR/2wcy0OopeXpFR1lQyqbWqRKuO3fA0ONkgpvbACs8vcHLQoRnzcJ8L1d9vFntKU4Z8X9//A6opJQnP5/M2l5FnJenAu8ry8A5P+e2rhrFrnIOu2qdwYc=
Received: from BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:405:e::12) by BN6PR11MB1313.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:404:48::19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3021.23; Thu, 21 May 2020 14:43:45 +0000
Received: from BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::39d9:b3b4:a981:2bd7]) by BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::39d9:b3b4:a981:2bd7%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3021.024; Thu, 21 May 2020 14:43:45 +0000
From: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>
To: Oscar González de Dios <oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com>
CC: opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OPSAWG] Minutes of L3NM/L2NM module discussions
Thread-Index: AdYveMQbVHtL7epySZ+8i/wromxgCwABXXsA
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 14:43:45 +0000
Message-ID: <465E792F-A57A-4AE1-AA0E-E791F7422D74@cisco.com>
References: <AM6PR06MB565337CF2FB735B53D6B52F7FDB70@AM6PR06MB5653.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM6PR06MB565337CF2FB735B53D6B52F7FDB70@AM6PR06MB5653.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
authentication-results: telefonica.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;telefonica.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2600:1700:b00:b239:e9a3:961c:8981:3f27]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 395865e8-6072-4bb6-4620-08d7fd955d28
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN6PR11MB1313:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN6PR11MB131315092EF43FFFE4C92E10B8B70@BN6PR11MB1313.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 041032FF37
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 73eEaM64Ooosj8WQPk9bTi1rLdjTlWzexBUQsQXhSx1AGgmiNa5DhWBCU8Hu0JyR5GcNPq/e1LIJYdRBatL+mAdBsDQzfDRATpeG1nkfE74ohpgcsJ5uRCbrGPKuy5dnqP/2YelXdqRQdioeAXjDmbEIZspxEfmZRi28ed6GLZSwswNgFMsSXhpr/qLWxEG04kzUaSYITJZlseEnUtuxdaEmP5Og30pfby8crfV1wfV6lo5wuvlxBwHjUShuDEctxDFz/xhqLS+1rNq/be5gjQ7+o7urCvp6n494cf2B2q/4dr74I/yUpbWiWYNb9Cstean3CE9kP2RcFlNQvxGH5ppR+WLtEQuzW4dR2bh6WD+EKtYFP87AJWAfRklxJcnHPPTjqQ2Kl1Gu92btzi7Q0DineX1WwPW3OLxL9PCgeExwri3lIn5cuMdN97lqrARbt6lu/1QNepLbvHBU1q9a7g==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(396003)(376002)(366004)(346002)(39860400002)(136003)(296002)(316002)(6916009)(6506007)(6512007)(33656002)(86362001)(5660300002)(478600001)(4326008)(36756003)(6486002)(71200400001)(186003)(8936002)(2906002)(8676002)(66446008)(2616005)(66946007)(66556008)(76116006)(91956017)(64756008)(66476007)(166002)(32563001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_465E792FA57A4AE1AA0EE791F7422D74ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 395865e8-6072-4bb6-4620-08d7fd955d28
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 May 2020 14:43:45.0829 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: AyXDZ9LP/Tc9306MNwF+PIVnmdoDKbVcAM32faAPhUUKsWUGRCfWYLo+c6MqLprCRa1BXJXGPkP5sw7s2WySGg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR11MB1313
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.13, xch-rcd-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/1EAA8MtH6WX94PcIVOV33wTcdRE>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Minutes of L3NM/L2NM module discussions
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 14:43:53 -0000

2. L3NM
    Revision of the three main issues:
Implementation Report by Cisco. It has two main issues (https://github.com/IETF-OPSAWG-WG/l3nm/issues/110)
- Common module to have all the L3NM specific requirements. Type-like module.
[Anton]: It makes implementation simpler. Does not generate unnecessary dependencies
[Adrian]: It depends on if we need module for specific types, to avoid unnecessary imports. Also don't you only need to import types, not the entire module?
[Qin]: With L3SM we did not take an augmentation approach. If there are common types defined in both models, then we may need to find the common components. We should decouple of L3SM.
[Sriram]: Prefer to have a separate type-file for the specific parameters.
[Oscar]: Define a common type-file for the service models.
[Qin]: Is it possible to manage it as an independent draft?

[Oscar in github issues]: After the discussions, it seems reasonable to have a separate Yang module to contain the types. The suggestion is to write the module to cover the four service models (client service models, l3sm, l2sm and Network service models, l2nm, l3nm). It seems reasonable to include this module in l3nm draft instead of creating a new one to avoid dependencies.
Samier, Dan and Anton to collaborate for a first version of the split

As chair, I want to call this out since it sounds like the authors made a decision here, and I want to make sure the whole WG has a chance to weigh in.  In reading these minutes and issue #110, I can see the value of a types module to avoid what may be confusing imports, but I want to know if anyone on the WG has a different opinion.

Joe