Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Tue, 02 February 2021 22:33 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 276813A0ABB for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 14:33:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UBigE84ee2RW for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 14:33:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F8B43A0A8E for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 14:33:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1l74F8-0007oQ-Ox; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 22:33:55 +0000
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 14:33:54 -0800
Message-ID: <m21rdyaylp.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Job Snijders <job@fastly.com>
Cc: Ops Area WG <opsawg@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <YBmgIsAsyhi04MJO@snel>
References: <BN6PR11MB1667D4EB91373CCB7F7A3F5AB8A09@BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <YBhTmPpaH7d/w9L+@snel> <m2zh0mba1e.wl-randy@psg.com> <YBmgIsAsyhi04MJO@snel>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/1NgJr2sr-C6gAJTE5t7ojoyCfUc>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 22:34:03 -0000

> The signature was produced through proprietary means, but for the
> purpose of validating the signature & interopability testing that
> shouldn't matter...  right?

unless you are a security person and lived through trojans such as
dual-ec.  extension of kerckhoffs's principle.

randy