IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] [Mud] The future of MUD work

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Mon, 19 August 2019 12:02 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84A6F120019; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 05:02:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PoR1GV9slJlf; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 05:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24842120013; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 05:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from LHREML711-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 8DEFFF1E4D4DBB50A6FF; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 13:02:17 +0100 (IST)
Received: from DGGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.33) by LHREML711-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 13:02:16 +0100
Received: from DGGEML511-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.9]) by DGGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com ([fe80::74d9:c659:fbec:21fa%31]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 20:02:12 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
CC: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, "mud@ietf.org" <mud@ietf.org>, "ops-ads@ietf.org" <ops-ads@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OPSAWG] [Mud] The future of MUD work
Thread-Index: AdVWhefvA5Ppb7FfT4GD4tFfpUDzUQ==
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 12:02:12 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABAA92A70B2@dggeml511-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.134.31.203]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABAA92A70B2dggeml511mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/1estrs8azBcOAJwr-JohXXNTUbI>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] [Mud] The future of MUD work
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 12:02:24 -0000

Although I haven’t been following this work closely, I believe MUD has some very interesting use cases, and I hope that work continues. I agree with Eliot that a working group must have a critical mass of people willing to do the work, not just show up at the meetings. I also think that once there are more than two or three drafts, on a topic we should move it out of OPSAWG, so MUD is a good candidate for a new WG.

-Qin
发件人: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Ted Lemon
发送时间: 2019年7月31日 18:15
收件人: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
抄送: opsawg@ietf.org; mud@ietf.org; ops-ads@ietf.org
主题: Re: [OPSAWG] [Mud] The future of MUD work

On Jul 31, 2019, at 4:45 AM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com<mailto:lear@cisco.com>> wrote:
On the other hand, it shouldn’t just be me.  It’d be a very small working group ;-) If others are interested, they should speak up.

I don’t think I would necessarily initiate work, but I suspect if there were a MUD WG I would show up for it and review documents.  The fact that MUD is in OPSAWG has meant that I don’t go because that’s not a WG I normally go to, and I didn’t realize that was where the MUD work was happening.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email