IETF Logo Mail Archive

[OPSAWG] WG LC for draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-10

Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> Wed, 20 September 2017 06:05 UTC

Return-Path: <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF231331FF; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 23:05:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jlgyCwNKtcKS; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 23:05:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8743F1331F5; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 23:05:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DOY34644; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 06:05:10 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.73) by lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.44) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 07:05:09 +0100
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by nkgeml412-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.73]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 14:05:06 +0800
From: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
To: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
CC: "opsawg-chairs@ietf.org" <opsawg-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG LC for draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-10
Thread-Index: AdMx1mdmlA5ckKCRRgOkkH52TiYS4g==
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 06:05:05 +0000
Message-ID: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21A2449947@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.156.116]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A0B0204.59C20516.0058, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 66e27cdcded1c4e138201a5414d61482
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/22Dc6B5uTM0ydF7xLK44JjYfoDs>
Subject: [OPSAWG] WG LC for draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-10
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 06:05:13 -0000

Dear OPSAWG,

The following draft was sent to IESG, but received some critical comments. 

Alternate Tunnel Encapsulation for Data Frames in CAPWAP
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-10

Now the authors have addressed all the comments, and received confirmation from the Security DIR reviewer.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-09-secdir-early-meadows-2017-08-10/

This is a notice to start a two-week OPSAWG WG last call review for the document.
Please read the above draft and send any issues, comments, or corrections to this mailing list.
Please indicate your support or concerns by Wednesday Oct 4, 2017.

Please note that the authors decided to change the document type to Experimental, as stated below:
1.3.  History of the document
   This document was started to accommodate Service Provider's need of a
   more flexible deployment mode with alternative tunnels [RFC7494].
   Experiments and tests have been done for this alt-tunnel network
   infrastructure.  However important, the deployment of relevant
   technology is yet to complete.  This experimental document is
   intended to serve as a historical reference for any future work as to
   the operational and deployment requirements.

Thanks,
Tianran, as co-chair

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email