Re: [OPSAWG] New Version Notification for draft-tuexen-opsawg-pcapng-02.txt

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Mon, 28 September 2020 20:30 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDBCE3A13DF for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 13:30:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eX4rcJZnh-LU for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 13:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DF9B3A13DE for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 13:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D88C389C6; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 16:35:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id hwBUu-93iNO5; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 16:35:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA41A389C4; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 16:35:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70597570; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 16:30:35 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>, pcap-ng-format@winpcap.org, opsawg@ietf.org, Jasper Bongertz <jasper@packet-foo.com>, tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org, Fulvio Risso <fulvio.risso@polito.it>, Guy Harris <gharris@sonic.net>, Gerald Combs <gerald@wireshark.org>
In-Reply-To: <100954A4-FAA0-4E40-B592-5F208DAB5F68@fh-muenster.de>
References: <160131683320.30001.4858487168061369615@ietfa.amsl.com> <31134.1601317608@localhost> <100954A4-FAA0-4E40-B592-5F208DAB5F68@fh-muenster.de>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 16:30:35 -0400
Message-ID: <30199.1601325035@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/2frq8feH4pAd6Z3wLtuKjuhxdtI>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] New Version Notification for draft-tuexen-opsawg-pcapng-02.txt
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 20:30:40 -0000

Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de> wrote:
    >> internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
    >>> Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-tuexen-opsawg-pcapng-02
    >>
    >> Hi, I have converted the xml to markdown.

    > Why? If we want to publish this, it will be published in xmlv3. So
    > better to use that format earlier...

It's so so so much easier to maintain and update and get contributions.
github will render it directly....

If you object strongly, we can stick to XML.

    >> The results in the diff are okay, but actually the conversion is not
    >> complete as I cheated and left the tables as preformatted figures, and
    >> there are many internal references that I have no yet updated.
    >>
    >> The xml file had a long list of URLs as references, many of which were
    >> duplicated.  I will be going through and fixing those in the next week
    >> or so.
    >>
    >> This work has been discussed on and off in OPSAWG, but at this point I
    >> am going to suggest that the document just go through the Independant
    >> Submission Editor.

    > Do we want to finally publish that? Up to now, I think the point was to
    > find a home where it is substantially discussed and improved...

If we can get OPSAWG to adopt it, great.
I'm just not holding my breath.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [