[OPSAWG] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-11: (with COMMENT)

[Mirja Kühlewind <[e-mail]>]

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

One comment on section 1:
"For example, they can shift some flows
  from congested links to low utilized links through an SDN controller
   or PCE [RFC4655]."
I'm not aware that ipfix information is commonly used for dynamic traffic
adaptation and I'm not sure that is recommendable. Can you maybe choose a
different example. E.g use of IPFIX for troubleshooting or more generally
network monitoring? Thanks!