[OPSAWG] 答复: WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf [CORRECT]

qinfengwei <qinfengwei@chinamobile.com> Fri, 25 September 2020 01:23 UTC

Return-Path: <qinfengwei@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BF393A091A; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:23:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PEUFUUa8O2Fl; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:22:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta1.chinamobile.com (cmccmta1.chinamobile.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F883A0917; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app03-12003 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee35f6d465fcf1-a5c9e; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:22:39 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee35f6d465fcf1-a5c9e
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from cmccPC (unknown[]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr07-12007 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee75f6d464df1b-69454; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:22:39 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee75f6d464df1b-69454
From: "qinfengwei" <qinfengwei@chinamobile.com>
To: "'Tianran Zhou'" <zhoutianran@huawei.com>, "'opsawg'" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Cc: <draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf@ietf.org>
References: <d5d0ea857305431893f72e1d442d47cc@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <d5d0ea857305431893f72e1d442d47cc@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:22:24 +0800
Message-ID: <006201d692da$56dbf5b0$0493e110$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0063_01D6931D.64FF35B0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AdaSPP9orIcydBuASU6vliZgCPjT/wAnU16g
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/3iNaBK61JiPPrkF79ZIpA2KQuAs>
Subject: [OPSAWG] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogIFdHTEMgZm9yIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtb3BzYXdn?= =?gb2312?b?LW50ZiBbQ09SUkVDVF0=?=
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 01:23:01 -0000

Hi ,

         I have read the latest version and support its publication as a






Fengwei Qin


发件人: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Tianran Zhou
发送时间: 2020年9月24日 14:39
收件人: opsawg
抄送: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf@ietf.org
主题: [OPSAWG] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf [CORRECT]


Sorry for attaching a wrong link to the draft. Please see as follows.


Hi WG,


This email starts a working group last call for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf.  



Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed
to the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If
you support it, please indicate that you have read the latest version and it
is ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and
nits are welcome.


The WG LC will end on 9st Oct 2020.