Re: [OPSAWG] WTP scan process in draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-extension-01
Liu Dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com> Fri, 14 February 2014 14:53 UTC
Return-Path: <maxpassion@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0641A0273 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 06:53:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LQD5KTE302yQ for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 06:53:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vc0-x22c.google.com (mail-vc0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB4CA1A022D for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 06:53:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id lf12so9537811vcb.3 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 06:53:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=5EQVOlteIWfebhlAzzBcJQyR3gvro51/85alkvkH9Q8=; b=dz/sxZ0MiBUq/qy4CeVLr/wOOgjBDWTVm95c9AV37RwVcPa8RQGVFBU0tbfNAeeRg8 rVDGG36g6PW2FI3lTPgiKEOxMkaRuPZmqte5gkPSkWKjZweW2L58IQv0fB9CGuYe1c93 04THRK08vyK5LpM1Mcra/uEQPrmrxcyR/QTcyHuJXCSLOD+6myVXdF+jf58eFuGA3+mr cuSeJ1aXBjZMawsm0HEz2Wc+QYLRGQNS1XHcVNes+fojygeV1Kuz4aNMQANA9Pb5x6M6 di3r4pbQ4mhnsowIix6Zt+9qubpxPm9sHGC0BaV8MT5M/08og3UH/M5S+lXqEExMlB0c dDaA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.230.105 with SMTP id sx9mr4870890vdc.10.1392389603259; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 06:53:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.221.24.146 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 06:53:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <527C2211.2010005@gmail.com>
References: <527C2211.2010005@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 22:53:23 +0800
Message-ID: <CAKcc6AdmSmb4wuKgLEUqxDBHBW7Sd0o62b3w1rY8T6DvW0sHpg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Liu Dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com>
To: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0111da1eb0fbc404f25ef7c0"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/3tUBkHxL-EVlTMBReGl4MFXs3BM
Cc: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WTP scan process in draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-extension-01
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:53:28 -0000
Dear Tom, We have submitted a new version of the draft and it address your comments here. Could you kind help to review it? http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-extension-02 Thanks, Dapeng Liu 2013-11-08 7:28 GMT+08:00 Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>: > I'm not clear on the description of scan only mode. Is it correct that the > WTP provides no service to stations when operating in this as opposed to > active mode? If so, setting PrimeChnlSrvTime to 0 makes sense, but there > should also be an explicit statement that no service is provided. If not, > it makes no sense to set PrimeChnlSrvTime to 0. > > Follow-up question: if no service is provided, is that true until the WTP > is reconfigured, or only until scanning is complete? > > Tom Taylor > -- ------ Best Regards, Dapeng Liu