[OPSAWG] Externalize some data nodes for better flexibilty (RE: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm-07)

mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Tue, 05 October 2021 12:21 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121853A0C67; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 05:21:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HHJgh4Z6WfDi; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 05:21:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.70.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E686E3A0C19; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 05:21:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr02.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.66]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by opfednr21.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 4HNxXJ1j7xz5w83; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 14:21:36 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1633436496; bh=cUBHfIoFB1K8Ri8XbBceR9Q6OtieQJX3GN5yRdQe9Ck=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=paPD2W3a7v29E4NIYPvhCK56R16HxL96CGP36W4f3qQwvfFLC3T4NwQsYMtj31/YU aJIa7dDCUMJn6LnhFmd5MkAI6O93rRWfpVS+NVag3zdBOpO0JAPodCVlGL0d3er2Yn CcbCZyWfMYRvjB4BLvpzLzwsUIY9H62qjeXNJsgtnXHjc1+5saWlC7wb1baqmpXKkE tggps6L8NE9apSiqRGFmD5Qr94FJ3+koc47wwg8mnagBsTpRMMnQNoxETQ0Gr0V7JL k5K98cKsFLGUg/ofhGvs8FZ3dWvqO4X3AUaiNkvuZeActcyQTDra6DYDTbxQWgXwVa /wdBtRfUgooLg==
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by opfednr02.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 4HNxXJ0jjxz8sYL; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 14:21:36 +0200 (CEST)
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
CC: "draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Externalize some data nodes for better flexibilty (RE: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm-07)
Thread-Index: Ade52IkmnpWcO29aS6C8S7l9DGYrYw==
Content-Class:
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 12:21:35 +0000
Message-ID: <29644_1633436496_615C4350_29644_315_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933035413901@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_SetDate=2021-10-05T11:02:22Z; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Method=Privileged; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Name=unrestricted_parent.2; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_SiteId=90c7a20a-f34b-40bf-bc48-b9253b6f5d20; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_ActionId=42b94fb1-2074-4bf4-89a0-fbd15d63814e; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_ContentBits=0
x-originating-ip: [10.114.13.247]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/5xfgm_rEkSV-vIbR4cQdh5Did5E>
Subject: [OPSAWG] Externalize some data nodes for better flexibilty (RE: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm-07)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 12:21:55 -0000

Hi all, 

Lada made a comment about the flexibility of the module (see below). A proposal to address the comment is to move the ethernet segment part into a separate module as suggested in the following PR: https://github.com/IETF-OPSAWG-WG/lxnm/pull/349/files. The change is straightforward and has the merit to preserve the same global structure for both L2NM and L3NM. 

Please review the PR and share your thoughts. 

Of course, do no change is still an option.

Cheers,
Med

> >> -----Message d'origine-----
> >> De : Ladislav Lhotka via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Envoyé :
> >> mardi 5 octobre 2021 10:04 À : yang-doctors@ietf.org Cc :
> >> draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm.all@ietf.org; last-call@ietf.org;
> >> opsawg@ietf.org Objet : Yangdoctors last call review of
> >> draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm-07
> >>
> >> Reviewer: Ladislav Lhotka
> >> Review result: Ready with Issues
> >>
> >> **** General comments
> >>
> >> The ietf-l2vpn-ntw module with about 400 data nodes represents an
> >> impressive amount of work. Its size, however, raises some concerns in
> >> terms of manageability. For example, if the ITU-T Y-1731
> >> recommendation ever gets updated (I don't know how likely this is),
> >> the module will have to be updated.
> >> I would therefore suggest to consider factoring out such parts into
> >> separate modules.
> >
> > [Med] We have already made an effort to factorize many items in:
> > * I-D.ietf-vpn-common
> > * two separate IANA-maintained modules
> >
> > One candidate "externalization" that I think would work to address your
> concern is to move ethernet-segments (and esi types) into a separate
> module.
> >
> > I have a preference to work in that direction vs. touching the OAM part.
> >
> > Would that solve your concern? Thank you.
> 
> I think it is up to the authors and WG to consider what to do, maybe
> nothing. I am not an expert in this domain, so I have no strong opinion,
> but it is certainly better to think twice because the module structure
> cannot be easily changed afterwards.



_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.