Re: [OPSAWG] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-ymbk-opsawg-finding-geofeeds

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Mon, 19 October 2020 17:49 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E6043A0EC5 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lH2aYpLYh0KV for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36A7C3A0EC3 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1kUZHY-0000pX-SW; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 17:49:17 +0000
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:49:16 -0700
Message-ID: <m2r1pu14yr.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>
Cc: opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <3B399322-A264-4B26-A2E9-50D812F0F71D@cisco.com>
References: <683B3974-C923-4B51-8C7E-3D8005941904@cisco.com> <8DB65180-CF9A-47B1-AD4F-6A8BCB1525E8@cisco.com> <m2sgaa15eq.wl-randy@psg.com> <3B399322-A264-4B26-A2E9-50D812F0F71D@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/69KDTUBXBPBavNMuihmifvfPpGI>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-ymbk-opsawg-finding-geofeeds
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 17:49:19 -0000

> Just the snark :-).
>>> I do think the “awesome” authentication bit might need to come out
>>> before ultimate publication, though.
>> just the snark, or are you saying the whole auth?

we can negotiate

btw, the draft is intended to document and prefer a new geofeed:
attribute, not just the interim remarks: hack.  e.g.

   Ideally, RPSL would be augmented to define a new RPSL geofeed:
   attribute in the inetnum: class.  Until such time, this document
   defines the syntax of a Geofeed remarks: attribute which contains an
   HTTPS URL of a geofeed file.

would you suggest stronger wording?

randy